Suppr超能文献

将厌氧培养方法引入临床微生物学实验室。

Introduction of anaerobic methodology into a clinical microbiological laboratory.

作者信息

Sonntag H G

出版信息

Infection. 1980;8 Suppl 2:S163-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01639884.

Abstract

For the successful introduction of anaerobic methodology into a clinical microbiological laboratory, several factors are very important. These include: 1) laboratory; 2) establishment of skilful technicians and adequate equipment; and 3) communication with clinicians who believe in anaerobes as infectious agents and are interested in working with the microbiologist. The beneficial effects of these factors on a laboratory's efficiency in providing an anaerobic service are demonstrated by the following data. In the period January to July 1978, we found 234/1446 specimens (16.2%) positive for anaerobes. The isolated strains mainly belonged to the genera Propionibacterium (26.5%), Bacteroides (26.1%), Clostridium (26.1%) and gram-positive cocci (18.4%). Fusobacterium could be found in 1.7% only. Specimens yielding anaerobes were mostly derived from infected wounds, pus, abscesses, and aspirated liquids from the pelvis, gall bladder or knee. The problem which now has to be solved concerns the significance of some of the anaerobic isolates as causative infectious agents in individual cases.

摘要

要成功地将厌氧培养方法引入临床微生物实验室,有几个因素非常重要。这些因素包括:1)实验室;2)培养熟练的技术人员并配备足够的设备;3)与相信厌氧菌是感染源且有兴趣与微生物学家合作的临床医生进行沟通。以下数据证明了这些因素对实验室提供厌氧培养服务效率的有益影响。在1978年1月至7月期间,我们发现1446份标本中有234份(16.2%)厌氧菌检测呈阳性。分离出的菌株主要属于丙酸杆菌属(26.5%)、拟杆菌属(26.1%)、梭菌属(26.1%)和革兰氏阳性球菌(18.4%)。仅1.7%的标本中可检测到梭杆菌属。产生厌氧菌的标本大多来自感染伤口、脓液、脓肿以及骨盆、胆囊或膝盖的吸出液。目前必须解决的问题是某些厌氧分离株在个别病例中作为致病感染源的意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验