Waitzkin H
Int J Health Serv. 1981;11(1):77-103. doi: 10.2190/5CDV-P4FE-Y6HN-JACD.
Although interest in the social origins of illness has grown recently, the sources of this concern in Marxist thought have received little attention. Friedrich Engels, Rudolf Virchow, and Salvador Allende made important early contributions to this field. Engels analyzed features of the workplace and environment that caused disability and early death for the British working class. Virchow's studies in "social medicine" and infectious diseases called for social change as a solution to medical problems. Allende traced poor health to class oppression, economic underdevelopment, and imperialism. These analysts provided divergent, though complementary, views of social etiology, multifactorial causation, the methodology of dialectic materialism, an activist role for medical scientists and practitioners, social epidemiology, health policy, and strategies of sociomedical change. The social origins of illness remain with us and reveal the scope of reconstruction needed for meaningful solutions.
尽管最近人们对疾病的社会根源的兴趣有所增加,但马克思主义思想中这种关注的来源却很少受到关注。弗里德里希·恩格斯、鲁道夫·菲尔绍和萨尔瓦多·阿连德在这一领域早期做出了重要贡献。恩格斯分析了导致英国工人阶级残疾和过早死亡的工作场所和环境特征。菲尔绍在“社会医学”和传染病方面的研究呼吁社会变革以解决医学问题。阿连德将健康不佳归因于阶级压迫、经济不发达和帝国主义。这些分析家对社会病因学、多因素因果关系、辩证唯物主义方法论、医学科学家和从业者的积极作用、社会流行病学、卫生政策以及社会医学变革策略提供了不同但互补的观点。疾病的社会根源仍然存在,并揭示了为找到有意义的解决方案所需的重建范围。