Perdigón G, Margni R A, Gentile T, Abatángelo C, Dokmetjian J
Immunology. 1982 Jan;45(1):183-90.
A comparative study has been made of human precipitating and co-precipitating anti-tetanus toxin antibodies. IgG co-precipitating antibody represented 10% of the total antibodies in the serum and had immunological and biological properties similar to those described for co-precipitating antibodies of other animal species. Human precipitating and co-precipitating antibodies had the same electrophoretic mobility and were localized in the same immunoglobulin fraction. By immunoprecipitation it was not possible to find antigenic differences between precipitating and co-precipitating antibodies. Both antibodies were localized in the IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses and neither were in the IgG4 subclass. Only the precipitating antibody can form insoluble complexes with antigen. Precipitating and co-precipitating antibodies agglutinated sensitized sheep red cells, however, only the precipitating antibody agglutinated human red cells. Eight to ten times more co-precipitating antibody was required to obtain a positive reaction in PCA. Precipitating antibody activated the complement system while co-precipitating antibody lacked this capacity. This difference in behaviour could not be attributed to localization of both antibodies in different IgG subclasses. Precipitating and co-precipitating antibodies were cytophilic. Only the former activated phagocytosis and increased clearance of antigen from the blood. These results are not surprising since co-precipitating antibody does not fix complement. Competition between human precipitating and co-precipitating antibodies in opsonization was analysed. In this test competition of both antibodies for the antigen depends on their respective amounts. The = 0.18 diminished to 0.05 when the ratio of pp:cop. antibody changed from 70:30 to 30:70. The fact that co-precipitating antibody was isolated from the sera of vertebrates other than man indicate that this antibody could possibly play a role in some immune mechanisms. Taking into account that in previous papers we have demonstrated that co-precipitating antibody functions as a molecule with one combining site of high affinity and one of low affinity, we have proposed that this antibody could function univalently and blocks the antigen. This could facilitate chronic parasitic, bacterial and viral infections, tumour growth and other chronic infections.
对人沉淀性抗破伤风毒素抗体和共沉淀性抗破伤风毒素抗体进行了一项比较研究。IgG共沉淀性抗体占血清中总抗体的10%,其免疫和生物学特性与其他动物物种的共沉淀性抗体所描述的特性相似。人沉淀性抗体和共沉淀性抗体具有相同的电泳迁移率,且定位在相同的免疫球蛋白组分中。通过免疫沉淀法无法发现沉淀性抗体和共沉淀性抗体之间的抗原性差异。两种抗体均定位在IgG1和IgG3亚类中,均不在IgG4亚类中。只有沉淀性抗体能与抗原形成不溶性复合物。沉淀性抗体和共沉淀性抗体能凝集致敏绵羊红细胞,然而,只有沉淀性抗体能凝集人红细胞。在被动皮肤过敏试验(PCA)中,需要多8至10倍的共沉淀性抗体才能获得阳性反应。沉淀性抗体能激活补体系统,而共沉淀性抗体缺乏这种能力。这种行为差异不能归因于两种抗体定位在不同的IgG亚类中。沉淀性抗体和共沉淀性抗体都是亲细胞性的。只有前者能激活吞噬作用并增加血液中抗原的清除率。这些结果并不令人惊讶,因为共沉淀性抗体不固定补体。分析了人沉淀性抗体和共沉淀性抗体在调理作用中的竞争情况。在该试验中,两种抗体对抗原的竞争取决于它们各自的量。当沉淀性抗体与共沉淀性抗体之比从70:30变为30:70时,亲和常数(Ka)从0.18降至0.05。共沉淀性抗体是从除人以外的脊椎动物血清中分离出来的,这一事实表明该抗体可能在某些免疫机制中发挥作用。考虑到在之前的论文中我们已经证明共沉淀性抗体作为一种具有一个高亲和力结合位点和一个低亲和力结合位点的分子发挥作用,我们提出这种抗体可能以单价形式发挥作用并阻断抗原。这可能会促进慢性寄生虫、细菌和病毒感染、肿瘤生长及其他慢性感染。