Suppr超能文献

实验性和自然感染大鼠中肺支原体检测方法的比较

Comparison of methods for detection of Mycoplasma pulmonis in experimentally and naturally infected rats.

作者信息

Davidson M K, Lindsey J R, Brown M B, Schoeb T R, Cassell G H

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Dec;14(6):646-55. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.6.646-655.1981.

Abstract

Isolation, indirect immunofluorescence, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and histopathological examination of tissues for characteristic lesions were evaluated for their efficiency in detecting Mycoplasma pulmonis infection in rats. Whereas all of the methods were efficient in naturally infected Sprague-Dawley rats, none of the methods consistently detected infection in F344 rats experimentally infected with low doses of the organism. In the experimental infections, however, the success rate of any method was directly related (P less than 0.05) to increasing inoculum dose and time postinoculation. Collectively, the data indicated that isolation of M. pulmonis was the most efficient single detection method and the nasopharyngeal duct was the best single site to culture, although sampling of multiple sites within the respiratory tract increased the rate of isolating the organism. The ELISA was understandably the least sensitive method in the low-dose, experimentally infected rats because of the time required for development of a detectable serum antibody response. Although each of the four methods identified a high percentage of naturally infected rats, the ELISA was the most efficient method in these animals as it was uniformly positive. The use of combinations of methods was found to increase the rate of detection of M. pulmonis infection in both experimentally and naturally infected rats.

摘要

对大鼠肺支原体感染的检测效率进行了评估,评估内容包括分离培养、间接免疫荧光法、酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)以及对组织特征性病变进行组织病理学检查。虽然所有方法在自然感染的斯普拉格-道利大鼠中都有效,但在实验性低剂量感染该病原体的F344大鼠中,没有一种方法能始终检测到感染。然而,在实验性感染中,任何一种方法的成功率都与接种剂量的增加和接种后时间直接相关(P小于0.05)。总体而言,数据表明,肺支原体的分离培养是最有效的单一检测方法,鼻咽管是最佳的单一培养部位,尽管对呼吸道内多个部位进行采样可提高分离该病原体的几率。在低剂量实验性感染的大鼠中,ELISA的敏感性最低,这是因为产生可检测到的血清抗体反应需要时间。虽然这四种方法都能检测出高比例的自然感染大鼠,但ELISA是这些动物中最有效的方法,因为它始终呈阳性。研究发现,联合使用多种方法可提高实验性感染和自然感染大鼠中肺支原体感染的检测率。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
The absorption of antibodies from immune sera by the gut of the young rat.幼鼠肠道对免疫血清中抗体的吸收。
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1955 Mar 15;143(912):408-13. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1955.0020.
3
Mycoplasma in leukemic and nonleukemic mice.白血病和非白血病小鼠中的支原体。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1967 Jul 28;143(1):345-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1967.tb27674.x.
4
Transmission of Mycoplasma pulmonis between rats.大鼠间肺支原体的传播
Lab Anim. 1972 Sep;6(3):331-6. doi: 10.1258/002367772781006068.
6
Natural infection of germfree rats with Mycoplasma pulmonis.
J Infect Dis. 1973 May;127(5):529-37. doi: 10.1093/infdis/127.5.529.
7
Uterine infections caused by bacteria and mycoplasma in mice and rats.
J Comp Pathol. 1972 Oct;82(4):477-82. doi: 10.1016/0021-9975(72)90048-5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验