• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of four membrane filter methods for fecal coliform enumeration.四种用于粪便大肠菌群计数的膜过滤法的比较。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Apr;43(4):787-93. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.4.787-793.1982.
2
Modification of M-FC medium by eliminating rosolic acid.通过去除玫红酸对M-FC培养基进行改良。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978 Jul;36(1):90-4. doi: 10.1128/aem.36.1.90-94.1978.
3
Membrane filter method for recovery of fecal coliforms in chlorinated sewage effluents.用于回收氯化污水中粪大肠菌群的膜过滤法。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Oct;32(4):547-52. doi: 10.1128/aem.32.4.547-552.1976.
4
Comparison of four membrane filter methods for fecal coliform enumeration in tropical waters.热带水域中粪便大肠菌群计数的四种膜过滤法比较
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Dec;53(12):2922-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.12.2922-2928.1987.
5
Improved membrane filter method for fecal coliform analysis.用于粪便大肠菌群分析的改良膜滤法。
Appl Microbiol. 1975 Apr;29(4):532-6. doi: 10.1128/am.29.4.532-536.1975.
6
Evaluation of standard and modified M-FC, MacConkey, and Teepol media for membrane filtration counting of fecal coliforms in water.评估标准和改良的M-FC培养基、麦康凯培养基和替波尔培养基用于水中粪大肠菌群的膜过滤计数。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Aug;42(2):192-9. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.2.192-199.1981.
7
Two-temperature membrane filter method for enumerating fecal coliform bacteria from chlorinated effluents.用于从氯化废水中计数粪大肠菌群的双温膜滤法。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Jun;33(6):1259-64. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.6.1259-1264.1977.
8
Rapid seven-hour fecal coliform test.七小时快速粪大肠菌群检测。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Aug;38(2):229-36. doi: 10.1128/aem.38.2.229-236.1979.
9
Membrane filter technique for the quantification of stressed fecal coliforms in the aquatic environment.用于量化水生环境中应激粪便大肠菌群的膜过滤技术。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Jul;34(1):42-6. doi: 10.1128/aem.34.1.42-46.1977.
10
Comparison of Gelman and Millipore membrane filters for enumerating fecal coliform bacteria.用于粪便大肠菌群计数的吉尔曼滤膜和密理博滤膜的比较。
Appl Microbiol. 1973 Sep;26(3):332-6. doi: 10.1128/am.26.3.332-336.1973.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival and activity ofStreptococcus faecalis andEscherichia coli in tropical freshwater.热带淡水中粪肠球菌和大肠杆菌的生存和活性。
Microb Ecol. 1989 Sep;18(2):125-34. doi: 10.1007/BF02030121.
2
Sunlight inactivation of enterococci and fecal coliforms in sewage effluent diluted in seawater.阳光在海水中稀释的污水中对肠球菌和粪大肠菌群的灭活作用。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Jun;60(6):2049-58. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.6.2049-2058.1994.
3
Evaluation of Colilert-18 for detection of coliforms and Eschericha coli in subtropical freshwater.评估Colilert-18用于检测亚热带淡水中的大肠菌群和大肠杆菌。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Feb;70(2):1242-4. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.1242-1244.2004.
4
Comparison of methods of enumerating coliforms after UV disinfection.紫外线消毒后大肠菌群计数方法的比较。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Oct;48(4):699-701. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.4.699-701.1984.
5
Anaerobic incubation of membrane filter cultures for improved detection of fecal coliforms from recreational waters.对膜滤培养物进行厌氧培养以改进对娱乐用水中粪大肠菌群的检测。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Aug;48(2):324-6. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.2.324-326.1984.
6
Survival and enumeration of the fecal indicators Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Escherichia coli in a tropical rain forest watershed.热带雨林流域中粪便指示菌青春双歧杆菌和大肠杆菌的存活与计数
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Aug;50(2):468-76. doi: 10.1128/aem.50.2.468-476.1985.
7
Comparison of four membrane filter methods for fecal coliform enumeration in tropical waters.热带水域中粪便大肠菌群计数的四种膜过滤法比较
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Dec;53(12):2922-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.12.2922-2928.1987.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of recovery methods to detect coliforms in water.评估水中大肠菌群检测的恢复方法。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Mar;33(3):590-5. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.3.590-595.1977.
2
Membrane filter method for enumerating Escherichia coli.用于计数大肠杆菌的膜过滤法。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 May;41(5):1152-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.5.1152-1158.1981.
3
Atypical Escherichia coli in streams.溪流中的非典型大肠杆菌。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 May;41(5):1276-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.5.1276-1278.1981.
4
Recovery of Escherichia coli from chlorinated secondary sewage.从氯化二级污水中回收大肠杆菌。
Appl Microbiol. 1974 Aug;28(2):328-9. doi: 10.1128/am.28.2.328-329.1974.
5
Evaluating the membrane fecal coliform test by using Escherichia coli as the indicator organism.以大肠杆菌作为指示生物评估膜滤法粪便大肠菌群检测。
Appl Microbiol. 1974 Apr;27(4):771-6. doi: 10.1128/am.27.4.771-776.1974.
6
Evaluation of coliform tests for chlorinated secondary effluents.氯化二级出水大肠菌群检测评估
J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1973 Mar;45(1):498-506.
7
Membrane filter procedure for enumerating the component genera of the coliform group in seawater.用于对海水中大肠菌群的组成属进行计数的膜过滤法。
Appl Microbiol. 1975 Jun;29(6):826-33. doi: 10.1128/am.29.6.826-833.1975.
8
Improved membrane filter method for fecal coliform analysis.用于粪便大肠菌群分析的改良膜滤法。
Appl Microbiol. 1975 Apr;29(4):532-6. doi: 10.1128/am.29.4.532-536.1975.
9
Membrane filter method for recovery of fecal coliforms in chlorinated sewage effluents.用于回收氯化污水中粪大肠菌群的膜过滤法。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Oct;32(4):547-52. doi: 10.1128/aem.32.4.547-552.1976.
10
Modification of M-FC medium by eliminating rosolic acid.通过去除玫红酸对M-FC培养基进行改良。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978 Jul;36(1):90-4. doi: 10.1128/aem.36.1.90-94.1978.

四种用于粪便大肠菌群计数的膜过滤法的比较。

Comparison of four membrane filter methods for fecal coliform enumeration.

作者信息

Pagel J E, Qureshi A A, Young D M, Vlassoff L T

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Apr;43(4):787-93. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.4.787-793.1982.

DOI:10.1128/aem.43.4.787-793.1982
PMID:7044309
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC241919/
Abstract

Four membrane filter methods fecal coliform enumeration were evaluated and compared in six laboratories based on determination of accuracy, specificity, upper counting limit, and recovery comparability. Recovery accuracy with pure cultures ranged from 89 to 100% for m-FC, mTEC (a procedure developed for thermotolerant Escherichia coli), and m-FC2 methods (the latter incorporating a 2-h, 35 degrees C resuscitation period), but was less than 60% for the MacConkey membrane broth method. These figures dropped by approximately 40 to 55% when the cultures were subjected to temperature (10 degrees C) stress. Close to 800 colonies were verified to determine specificity. False-positive colonies occurred most frequently with the m-FC2 method (18%), whereas false-negative colonies were most common on MacConkey membrane broth (26%). In counting range experiments using a variety of samples, the highest upper counting limit was 130 colonies per filter with the mTEC procedure. Recovery comparisons were based on over 130 samples including raw surface waters, raw sewage, and chlorinated and unchlorinated sewage effluents. In general, recoveries were significantly higher with the m-FC2 and mTEC methods; however, on m-FC2, growth of nontarget background organisms was also higher in most cases. Highest recoveries from chlorinated sewage effluents were obtained by the mTEC method, and the addition of a similar resuscitation period to the m-FC procedure (m-FC2) improved fecal coliform recovery from such samples. The best overall performance for fecal coliform enumeration was obtained with the mTEC method with high recovery and low levels of background colonies, good specificity and accuracy, and a high upper counting limit. This procedure also offers the advantage of enumerating E. coli within 24 h.

摘要

在六个实验室中,基于准确性、特异性、计数上限和回收率可比性的测定,对四种膜过滤法粪便大肠菌群计数方法进行了评估和比较。对于m-FC、mTEC(一种为耐热大肠杆菌开发的方法)和m-FC2方法(后者包含2小时、35摄氏度的复苏期),纯培养物的回收率在89%至100%之间,但麦康凯膜肉汤法的回收率低于60%。当培养物受到温度(10摄氏度)胁迫时,这些数字下降了约40%至55%。通过检测近800个菌落来确定特异性。m-FC2方法出现假阳性菌落的频率最高(18%),而麦康凯膜肉汤上出现假阴性菌落最为常见(26%)。在使用各种样品的计数范围实验中,mTEC方法的最高计数上限为每个滤膜130个菌落。回收率比较基于130多个样品,包括原地表水、原污水以及经过氯化和未氯化处理的污水。总体而言,m-FC2和mTEC方法的回收率显著更高;然而,在m-FC2方法中,大多数情况下非目标背景微生物的生长也更高。mTEC方法从氯化污水中获得的回收率最高,并且在m-FC程序(m-FC2)中添加类似的复苏期可提高此类样品中粪便大肠菌群的回收率。mTEC方法在粪便大肠菌群计数方面总体表现最佳,回收率高、背景菌落水平低、特异性和准确性良好且计数上限高。该方法还具有在24小时内对大肠杆菌进行计数的优势。