Appelbaum P C, Arthur R R, Parker M E, Shugar G L, Von Kuster L C, Charache P
Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Sep;78(3):351-5. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/78.3.351.
Two commercial methods, API 20E (as modified for same-day enterobacterial identification) and Micro-ID, were evaluated for ability to provide useful same-day information of 368 clinically isolated Enterobacteriaceae. Organisms included Escherichia coli (54), Shigella (7), Edwardsiella tarda (1), Salmonella enteritidis (10), Citrobacter (30), Klebsiella (55), Enterobacter (68), Hafnia alvei (2), Serratia (33), Proteus (64), Morganella morganii (24), Providencia (18), and Yersinia enterocolitica (2). Methods were those of manufacturers without supplemental tests. API at five hours identified 78.5% of strains to species, 9.5% to genus only, 10.1% as part of a spectrum of identifications (SI), and 1.9% incorrect. Micro-ID at four hours yielded 90.0% correct identification to species and 3.3% to genus only, 4.0% SI, and 2.7% incorrect. API identification of many Serratia, Citrobacter, Providencia strains was to genus only; most incorrect results occurred in Serratia marcescens. Micro-ID identified most organisms to species; incorrect identifications were mainly S. marcescens and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Both systems provided excellent identification of E. coli. Both methods sacrifice a degree of accuracy that varies with the species tested, as compared to overnight systems, but both provide rapid information of potential clinical value.
对两种商业方法,即API 20E(为当日进行肠杆菌鉴定而改良)和Micro-ID,评估其对368株临床分离的肠杆菌科细菌提供有用的当日信息的能力。这些微生物包括大肠杆菌(54株)、志贺氏菌(7株)、迟缓爱德华氏菌(1株)、肠炎沙门氏菌(10株)、柠檬酸杆菌(30株)、克雷伯氏菌(55株)、肠杆菌(68株)、蜂房哈夫尼亚菌(2株)、沙雷氏菌(33株)、变形杆菌(64株)、摩根氏摩根菌(24株)、普罗威登斯菌(18株)和小肠结肠炎耶尔森氏菌(2株)。采用的是制造商推荐的方法,未进行补充试验。API在5小时时将78.5%的菌株鉴定到种,9.5%仅鉴定到属,10.1%作为一系列鉴定结果(SI)的一部分,1.9%鉴定错误。Micro-ID在4小时时对种的正确鉴定率为90.0%,仅鉴定到属的为3.3%,SI为4.0%,错误鉴定为2.7%。API对许多沙雷氏菌、柠檬酸杆菌、普罗威登斯菌菌株仅鉴定到属;大多数错误结果出现在粘质沙雷氏菌中。Micro-ID将大多数微生物鉴定到种;错误鉴定主要是粘质沙雷氏菌和肺炎克雷伯氏菌。两种系统对大肠杆菌的鉴定都非常出色。与过夜鉴定系统相比,这两种方法都牺牲了一定程度的准确性,且准确性随测试的菌种而异,但它们都能提供具有潜在临床价值的快速信息。