Suppr超能文献

评估四小时微生物鉴定技术用于直接从血培养物中鉴定氧化酶阴性革兰氏阴性杆菌的效果。

Evaluation of the four-hour Micro-ID technique for direct identification of oxidase-negative, Gram-negative rods from blood cultures.

作者信息

Appelbaum P C, Schick S F, Kellogg J A

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Oct;12(4):533-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.4.533-537.1980.

Abstract

A 4-h Micro-ID technique for direct identification of oxidase-negative gram-negative rods from positive blood cultures was compared to subculture and species identification of single colonies by API 20E and Micro-ID, using standardized inocula. A total of 127 patients (220 positive cultures) were studied. Isolates included 96 Escherichia coli, 46 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 7 Klebsiella oxytoca, 8 Enterobacter aerogenes, 17 Enterobacter cloacae, 19 Serratia marcescens, 2 Serratia liquefaciens, 8 Proteus mirabilis, 1 Salmonella species, 1 Morganella morganii, 6 Haemophilus influenzae, 2 Haemophilus parainfluenzae, 3 Bacteroides fragilis, 3 Acinetobacter calcoaceticus biotype anitratus, and 1 Pseudomonas maltophilia. In 90% of the cultures, identification by Micro-ID was identical to that obtained after subculture; if the 15 non-enterobacterial isolates were excluded, the corresponding figure was 96.6%. Enterobacteria identified incorrectly by direct Micro-ID were three S. marcescens (two identified as S. liquefaciens, one as Hafnia alvei), two S. liquefaciens (both identified as E. cloacae), and two K. pneumoniae (one identified as Klebsiella ozaenae, the other as Serratia rubidaea). None of the 15 non-enterobacterial cultures were correctly identified by Micro-ID (non-identifiable, or classified as Providencia/Yersinia/Klebsiella species). Although biochemical discrepancies between direct and final Micro-ID tests occurred in 41% of the enterobacterial cultures, this did not seriously interfere with identification. Direct species identification of Enterobacteriaceae from blood cultures by direct Micro-ID is accurate and easily performed and identified organisms within 4 h compared to at least 24 h by most other methods; the direct Micro-ID technique would be rendered even more valuable by the additional capability of identifying non-enterobacterial gram-negative isolates.

摘要

将一种用于从阳性血培养物中直接鉴定氧化酶阴性革兰氏阴性杆菌的4小时微量鉴定技术,与使用标准化接种物通过API 20E和微量鉴定对单个菌落进行传代培养和菌种鉴定的方法进行了比较。共研究了127例患者(220份阳性培养物)。分离出的菌株包括96株大肠杆菌、46株肺炎克雷伯菌、7株产酸克雷伯菌、8株产气肠杆菌、17株阴沟肠杆菌、19株粘质沙雷菌、2株液化沙雷菌、8株奇异变形杆菌、1株沙门氏菌、1株摩根氏摩根菌、6株流感嗜血杆菌、2株副流感嗜血杆菌、3株脆弱拟杆菌、3株醋酸钙不动杆菌无硝亚种和1株嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌。在90%的培养物中,微量鉴定的结果与传代培养后的结果一致;如果排除15株非肠杆菌属分离株,相应的比例为96.6%。通过直接微量鉴定错误鉴定的肠杆菌有3株粘质沙雷菌(2株鉴定为液化沙雷菌,1株鉴定为蜂房哈夫尼亚菌)、2株液化沙雷菌(均鉴定为阴沟肠杆菌)和2株肺炎克雷伯菌(1株鉴定为臭鼻克雷伯菌,另1株鉴定为深红沙雷菌)。15份非肠杆菌属培养物中没有一份通过微量鉴定得到正确鉴定(无法鉴定,或归类为普罗威登斯菌属/耶尔森菌属/克雷伯菌属菌种)。虽然41%的肠杆菌属培养物中直接微量鉴定试验和最终微量鉴定试验之间存在生化差异,但这并未严重干扰鉴定。通过直接微量鉴定从血培养物中直接进行肠杆菌科菌种鉴定准确且易于操作,与大多数其他方法至少需要24小时相比,可在4小时内鉴定出微生物;如果具有鉴定非肠杆菌属革兰氏阴性分离株的额外能力,直接微量鉴定技术将更有价值。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Update on detection of bacteremia and fungemia.菌血症和真菌血症检测的最新进展。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997 Jul;10(3):444-65. doi: 10.1128/CMR.10.3.444.
6
Four-hour direct identification of Enterobacteriaceae in blood cultures.
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Dec;2(6):593-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02016573.

本文引用的文献

6
Inoculation of API-20E from positive blood cultures.从阳性血培养物中接种API-20E。
J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Dec;4(6):522-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.6.522-523.1976.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验