Kaplan P S, Hearst E
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1982 Apr;8(2):187-203.
In four experiments pigeons were exposed to key-light illuminations separated from food delivery by 12-60 sec. Approach to the key light did not develop on conventional trace-conditioning arrangements but occurred consistently whenever some auditory or visual stimulus (a) filled the CS-US gap (serial conditioning) or (b) was always present except during the gap. Various comparison groups showed that this enhancement of conditioning cannot be mainly attributed to similarity between the CS and the added stimulus, or to spread of specific responses evoked by that stimulus, or to potentiation of CS's neural aftereffects by the extra stimulus. However, modifications of condition b in the final experiment revealed that CS approach was strong only when the stimulus present during the intertrial interval remained on until the termination of CS; if the stimulus ended at CS onset, conditioning did not occur. Although discriminability of CS-US gaps from intertrial periods seems necessary for conditioning to occur in the absence of close CS-US contiguity, the outcome of the final experiment indicates that such discriminability is not sufficient for conditioning. The results are primarily interpreted in terms of (a) possible second-order conditioning effects and (b) changes in the associative strength of the "local context" existing when CS appears, which may lead to superconditioning of CS.
在四项实验中,鸽子被暴露于与食物投递间隔12 - 60秒的按键灯光照明下。在传统的痕迹条件作用安排中,鸽子并未对按键灯光产生趋近行为,但只要有某种听觉或视觉刺激(a)填补了条件刺激(CS)与非条件刺激(US)之间的间隔(序列条件作用),或者(b)除了间隔期间一直存在,趋近按键灯光的行为就会持续出现。多个对照组表明,这种条件作用的增强不能主要归因于条件刺激与添加刺激之间的相似性,或该刺激引发的特定反应的扩散,或额外刺激对条件刺激神经后效应的增强。然而,最后一项实验中对条件b的修改表明,只有当试验间隔期间存在的刺激持续到条件刺激结束时,对条件刺激的趋近行为才强烈;如果该刺激在条件刺激开始时结束,则不会产生条件作用。虽然在条件刺激与非条件刺激没有紧密相邻的情况下,区分条件刺激与非条件刺激间隔和试验间隔似乎是产生条件作用所必需的,但最后一项实验的结果表明,这种可区分性对于条件作用来说并不充分。这些结果主要从以下方面进行解释:(a)可能的二级条件作用效应,以及(b)条件刺激出现时存在的“局部情境”的联想强度变化,这可能导致对条件刺激的超条件作用。