Mitchell D M, Fries J F
Arthritis Rheum. 1982 May;25(5):481-7. doi: 10.1002/art.1780250501.
When a community-derived population of 840 rheumatoid arthritis patients was used to test the American Rheumatism Association's 11 diagnostic criteria for rheumatoid arthritis, these criteria divided patients into 3 reasonably distinct classifications (probable, definite, and classic). The severity of disease increased in direct proportion to the number of positive criteria. Three criteria involve invasive procedures that are rarely performed; they are unnecessary for effective use of the other 8 criteria. Although 256 possible combinations of these 8 criteria exist, the criteria function principally to classify patients into only 7 major clinical syndromes, each of which corresponds to a major clinical presentation. By identifying the logical interrelationships between criteria in this report, we have confirmed their applicability and provided insight into the manner by which criteria classify patients.
当用一个来自社区的840名类风湿性关节炎患者群体来测试美国风湿病协会的11条类风湿性关节炎诊断标准时,这些标准将患者分为3个相当不同的类别(可能、肯定和典型)。疾病的严重程度与阳性标准的数量成正比。其中3条标准涉及很少进行的侵入性检查;有效使用其他8条标准时,这些检查并非必需。虽然这8条标准存在256种可能的组合,但这些标准主要是将患者仅分为7种主要临床综合征,每种综合征都对应一种主要临床表现。通过在本报告中确定各标准之间的逻辑相互关系,我们证实了它们的适用性,并深入了解了这些标准对患者进行分类的方式。