Haas F, Simnowitz M, Axen K, Gaudino D, Haas A
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982 Apr;52(4):879-86. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1982.52.4.879.
The upper body posture naturally adopted by long distance runners was quantified, and its effects on ventilation were assessed in 14 subjects. Maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) and flow-volume loop maneuvers were performed in three seated positions: 1) natural running posture (RUN), with back angled forward 11 degrees, neck flexed, and head extended 35 degrees forward of the spinal column; 2) back vertical with head and neck as above (NEF); and 3) head and back vertical (VERT). MVV was significantly higher in RUN compared with both NEF and VERT, as were peak inspiratory pressure (PImax) from functional residual capacity, peak expiratory flow (PEF), and peak inspiratory flow (PIF). Expiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity was significantly higher in RUN and NEF than in VERT, consistent with reported increases in flow due to tracheal stiffening. The increased PIF and PImax in RUN indicate increased inspiratory muscle tension and/or improved transduction of tension into a more negative pleural pressure. Magnetometer tracings of rib cage dimensions demonstrated greater anteroposterior stability during maximal inspiratory efforts in RUN compared with VERT. The improved inspiratory function seen in RUN may be due to more effective diaphragmatic and/or accessory muscle function. These findings demonstrate that the position naturally adopted by long distance runners favors ventilation.
对长跑运动员自然采用的上身姿势进行了量化,并评估了其对14名受试者通气的影响。在三种坐姿下进行了最大自主通气量(MVV)和流量-容积环测试:1)自然跑步姿势(RUN),背部向前倾斜11度,颈部弯曲,头部在脊柱前方伸展35度;2)背部垂直,头部和颈部保持上述姿势(NEF);3)头部和背部垂直(VERT)。与NEF和VERT相比,RUN时的MVV显著更高,从功能残气量开始的吸气峰压(PImax)、呼气峰流量(PEF)和吸气峰流量(PIF)也是如此。RUN和NEF时肺活量50%时的呼气流量显著高于VERT,这与报道的气管硬化导致流量增加一致。RUN时PIF和PImax的增加表明吸气肌张力增加和/或将张力转化为更负的胸膜压力的能力提高。胸腔尺寸的磁力计追踪显示,与VERT相比,RUN在最大吸气努力时的前后稳定性更高。RUN中观察到的吸气功能改善可能归因于更有效的膈肌和/或辅助肌功能。这些发现表明,长跑运动员自然采用的姿势有利于通气。