Crawford H J
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1982 May;42(5):915-26. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.42.5.915.
In 25 male and 31 female university student and staff volunteers, the interrelationships between the following measures were studied: hypnotic susceptibility (Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Forms A and C), imagery vividness (Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire; VVIQ), involvement in everyday activities (Tellegen Absorption Scale; TAS), and daydreaming styles (28 scales of Singer & Antrobus's Imaginal Processes Inventory). Factor analysis produced a factor characterized as a positively vivid and absorptive imagination style. Hypnotic susceptibility, VVIQ, TAS, and positive-affect daydreaming styles all loaded on this factor. Two other factors were a dysphoric daydreaming style and a lack-of-attentional-control style. Stepwise multiple regressions suggested that males and females, at least within this sample, exhibit different relationships between hypnotic susceptibility and predictor variables. Similar differences were found for the VVIQ and the TAS and their daydreaming-scale predictor variables.
在25名男性和31名女性大学生及教职工志愿者中，研究了以下测量指标之间的相互关系：催眠易感性（斯坦福催眠易感性量表，A版和C版）、意象生动性（视觉意象生动性问卷；VVIQ）、参与日常活动程度（特根吸收量表；TAS）以及白日梦风格（辛格和安特罗布斯的意象过程量表中的28个量表）。因子分析产生了一个被描述为具有积极生动且专注的想象风格的因子。催眠易感性、VVIQ、TAS以及积极情感白日梦风格均加载于该因子上。另外两个因子分别是烦躁不安的白日梦风格和注意力控制缺失风格。逐步多元回归分析表明，至少在这个样本中，男性和女性在催眠易感性与预测变量之间呈现出不同的关系。在VVIQ和TAS及其白日梦量表预测变量方面也发现了类似的差异。
