Katch V, Weltman A, Sady S, Freedson P
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1978 Oct 20;39(4):219-27. doi: 10.1007/BF00421445.
The validity of the relative percent concept for equating training intensity was investigated using the point of metabolic acidosis (anaerobic threshold) as the criterion variable. Percent oxygen uptake, heart rate and metabolic acidosis were determined at 60, 70, and 80% of max heart rate on a bicycle ergometer test(N = 31). At 60 and 70% of max heart rate only one individual was definitely in metabolic acidosis. At 80% max heart rate 17 subjects were working at a level above the point of metabolic acidosis while 14 were working at or below this point. Thus, it was suggested that even if subjects are exercising at the same relative percent miximum HR, the metabolic stress using metabolic acidosis as the criterion is not constant across subjects. It was further shown that the regression of percent VO2 max on percent max HR was a spurious one resulting in poor prediction of individual VO2 values. The data presented suggest that the relative percent concept for equating exercise or subsequent training intensity needs careful re-evaluation.
以代谢性酸中毒(无氧阈)为标准变量,研究了用于衡量训练强度的相对百分比概念的有效性。在自行车测力计测试中,以最大心率的60%、70%和80%测定摄氧量百分比、心率和代谢性酸中毒情况(N = 31)。在最大心率的60%和70%时,只有一名个体处于明确的代谢性酸中毒状态。在最大心率的80%时,17名受试者的工作强度高于代谢性酸中毒点,而14名受试者的工作强度处于或低于该点。因此,有人提出,即使受试者以相同的相对百分比最大心率进行锻炼,以代谢性酸中毒为标准衡量的代谢压力在不同受试者之间也并非恒定不变。进一步研究表明,最大摄氧量百分比对最大心率百分比的回归是一种虚假回归,导致对个体摄氧量值的预测效果不佳。所呈现的数据表明,用于衡量运动或后续训练强度的相对百分比概念需要仔细重新评估。