• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一次性皮肤缝合器与尼龙缝线用于伤口闭合的比较。

A comparison of a disposable skin stapler and nylon sutures for wound closure.

作者信息

Meiring L, Cilliers K, Barry R, Nel C J

出版信息

S Afr Med J. 1982 Sep 4;62(11):371-2.

PMID:7112304
Abstract

A disposable skin stapler (Proximate; Ethicon) was compared with conventional nylon sutures in respect of time taken for wound closure, cosmetic result and ease of application and removal. It was found that a time saving of 80% is possible with the stapling device, and that the cosmetic result with staples is as good as if not better than that with nylon sutures. A certain amount of experience and practice facilitates the use of the stapler.

摘要

将一种一次性皮肤缝合器(Proximate;爱惜康公司)与传统尼龙缝线在伤口闭合所需时间、美容效果以及应用和拆除的难易程度方面进行了比较。结果发现,使用缝合器可节省80%的时间,而且使用缝合器的美容效果即便不比尼龙缝线更好,也与尼龙缝线一样好。一定的经验和练习有助于使用该缝合器。

相似文献

1
A comparison of a disposable skin stapler and nylon sutures for wound closure.一次性皮肤缝合器与尼龙缝线用于伤口闭合的比较。
S Afr Med J. 1982 Sep 4;62(11):371-2.
2
Skin closure using staples and nylon sutures: a comparison of results.使用吻合钉和尼龙缝线进行皮肤缝合:结果比较
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987 Mar;69(2):76-8.
3
[Cutaneous mechanical staplers. Our experience].[皮肤机械吻合器。我们的经验]
Minerva Chir. 1997 Jul-Aug;52(7-8):1009-13.
4
Abdominal wound closure comparing the proximate stapler with sutures.腹部伤口缝合:吻合器与缝线的比较
Aust N Z J Surg. 1985 Aug;55(4):405-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1985.tb00910.x.
5
Randomised trial comparing Proximate stapler with conventional skin closure.比较近端吻合器与传统皮肤缝合的随机试验。
Acta Chir Scand. 1981;147(7):501-2.
6
[Stapler suture or single button suture? A controlled clinical study on the comparison of both skin closure methods].[吻合器缝合还是单纽扣缝合?两种皮肤缝合方法比较的对照临床研究]
Chirurg. 1985 Mar;56(3):151-5.
7
Clinical comparison of Michel and Proximate clips used for abdominal wound closure.用于腹部伤口闭合的Michel夹和Proximate夹的临床比较。
Can J Surg. 1984 Nov;27(6):594-7.
8
New advances in automatic disposable rotating cartridge skin staplers.一次性自动旋转式皮肤缝合器的新进展。
Burns. 1993 Apr;19(2):159-65. doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(93)90042-7.
9
Use of skin stapler in dermatologic surgery.皮肤吻合器在皮肤科手术中的应用。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982 Mar;6(3):305-9. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(82)70020-9.
10
Long-term cosmetic results comparing Proximate stapler with Dermalon skin closure.比较近端吻合器与 Dermalon 皮肤缝合器的长期美容效果。
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1985;74(1):30-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Study of Use of Reusable Skin Staples and Vertical Mattress Sutures in the Closure of Midline Laparotomy Wounds.可重复使用皮肤吻合钉与垂直褥式缝合用于中线剖腹手术伤口闭合的比较研究
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2024 Jan-Mar;14(1):41-47. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_50_23. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
2
Natural language processing for the automated detection of intra-operative elements in lumbar spine surgery.用于腰椎手术中术中元素自动检测的自然语言处理
Front Surg. 2023 Dec 18;10:1271775. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1271775. eCollection 2023.
3
Surgical site infection after wound closure with staples versus sutures in elective knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
择期膝关节和髋关节置换术中使用吻合钉与缝线闭合伤口后的手术部位感染:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arthroplasty. 2022 Mar 4;4(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s42836-021-00110-7.
4
Staples versus sutures for skin closure in hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.髋关节置换术中皮肤缝合的缝线与订书钉比较:荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Dec 24;16(1):735. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02870-z.
5
Staples Versus Sutures for Skin Closure in Standard Four Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study.标准四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中皮肤缝合用吻合钉与缝线的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究
Cureus. 2021 Mar 6;13(3):e13725. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13725.
6
A double-blinded randomised controlled trial - do subcuticular non-absorbable skin sutures have a better aesthetic outcome than skin staples in large wound closures?一项双盲随机对照试验——在大型伤口缝合中,皮下不可吸收皮肤缝线在美学效果上是否优于皮肤吻合钉?
GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2019 Nov 15;8:Doc16. doi: 10.3205/iprs000142. eCollection 2019.
7
Concealed cosmetic closure in total knee replacement surgery - A prospective audit assessing appearance and patient satisfaction.全膝关节置换手术中的隐蔽美容缝合——一项评估外观及患者满意度的前瞻性审计
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Jan-Feb;10(1):111-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
8
Staples equal sutures for skin closure after soft tissue tumor resection.皮内缝合与缝线缝合在软组织肿瘤切除术后皮缘关闭中的效果相当。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Mar;471(3):899-904. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2524-z.
9
Modality of wound closure after total knee replacement: are staples as safe as sutures? A retrospective study of 181 patients.全膝关节置换术后伤口闭合方式:吻合钉与缝线一样安全吗?一项对181例患者的回顾性研究。
Patient Saf Surg. 2011 Oct 19;5(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-5-26.
10
Association between incisional surgical site infection and the type of skin closure after stoma closure.肠造口关闭术后切口部位手术感染与缝合类型的关系。
Surg Today. 2011 Jul;41(7):941-5. doi: 10.1007/s00595-010-4405-y. Epub 2011 Jul 12.