• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较近端吻合器与传统皮肤缝合的随机试验。

Randomised trial comparing Proximate stapler with conventional skin closure.

作者信息

Eldrup J, Wied U, Andersen B

出版信息

Acta Chir Scand. 1981;147(7):501-2.

PMID:7048825
Abstract

The Proximate stapler was compared with usual skin closure in a randomized trial, with 137 patients having elective abdominal and breast surgery. The median duration of skin closure with the Proximate stapler was 80 seconds, which was significantly shorter than the median of 242 seconds with conventional closure. No difference was found with regard to wound infection, but pain was more frequent after stapling.

摘要

在一项随机试验中,对137例行择期腹部和乳房手术的患者,将Proximate吻合器与常规皮肤缝合方法进行了比较。使用Proximate吻合器进行皮肤缝合的中位时间为80秒,显著短于传统缝合的中位时间242秒。在伤口感染方面未发现差异,但吻合器缝合后疼痛更为常见。

相似文献

1
Randomised trial comparing Proximate stapler with conventional skin closure.比较近端吻合器与传统皮肤缝合的随机试验。
Acta Chir Scand. 1981;147(7):501-2.
2
Abdominal wound closure comparing the proximate stapler with sutures.腹部伤口缝合:吻合器与缝线的比较
Aust N Z J Surg. 1985 Aug;55(4):405-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1985.tb00910.x.
3
[Stapler suture or single button suture? A controlled clinical study on the comparison of both skin closure methods].[吻合器缝合还是单纽扣缝合?两种皮肤缝合方法比较的对照临床研究]
Chirurg. 1985 Mar;56(3):151-5.
4
A comparison of a disposable skin stapler and nylon sutures for wound closure.一次性皮肤缝合器与尼龙缝线用于伤口闭合的比较。
S Afr Med J. 1982 Sep 4;62(11):371-2.
5
[Cutaneous mechanical staplers. Our experience].[皮肤机械吻合器。我们的经验]
Minerva Chir. 1997 Jul-Aug;52(7-8):1009-13.
6
Staples for wound closure: a controlled trial.用于伤口闭合的吻合钉:一项对照试验。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1985 Sep;67(5):318-20.
7
Long-term cosmetic results comparing Proximate stapler with Dermalon skin closure.比较近端吻合器与 Dermalon 皮肤缝合器的长期美容效果。
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1985;74(1):30-1.
8
Clinical comparison of Michel and Proximate clips used for abdominal wound closure.用于腹部伤口闭合的Michel夹和Proximate夹的临床比较。
Can J Surg. 1984 Nov;27(6):594-7.
9
Staples or sutures for mastectomy wounds? A randomised trial.乳房切除术伤口用吻合钉还是缝线?一项随机试验。
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1983 Jan;28(1):17-8.
10
Skin closure after infrainguinal bypass surgery: a prospective randomised study.股动脉以下旁路手术后的皮肤缝合:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002 Apr;23(4):321-4. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2001.1593.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Study of Use of Reusable Skin Staples and Vertical Mattress Sutures in the Closure of Midline Laparotomy Wounds.可重复使用皮肤吻合钉与垂直褥式缝合用于中线剖腹手术伤口闭合的比较研究
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2024 Jan-Mar;14(1):41-47. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_50_23. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
2
Staples Versus Sutures for Skin Closure in Standard Four Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study.标准四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中皮肤缝合用吻合钉与缝线的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究
Cureus. 2021 Mar 6;13(3):e13725. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13725.
3
Surgical wound closure by staples or sutures?: Systematic review.
使用吻合钉或缝线进行手术伤口闭合:系统评价。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 19;99(25):e20573. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020573.
4
Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.非产科手术中用于皮肤缝合的皮下缝合线
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 9;4(4):CD012124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012124.pub2.
5
Superficial Surgical Site Infection Following the Use of Intracutaneous Sutures Versus Staples.皮内缝合与订书钉在浅表手术部位感染中的应用比较。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 May 24;116(21):365-371. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0365.
6
Closure of hip wound, clips or subcuticular sutures: does it make a difference?髋部伤口闭合,使用夹子或皮下缝合:有区别吗?
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2006 Jun;16(2):124-129. doi: 10.1007/s00590-005-0043-2. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
7
Comparing sutures versus staples for skin closure after orthopaedic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.骨科手术后皮肤缝合使用缝线与吻合钉的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 20;6(1):e009257. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009257.
8
Intracutaneous suture versus transcutaneous skin stapling for closure of midline or horizontal skin incision in elective abdominal surgery and their outcome on superficial surgical site infections--INTRANS: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.择期腹部手术中皮内缝合与经皮皮肤吻合器缝合中线或水平皮肤切口及其对手术部位浅表感染的影响——INTRANS:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Jan 16;15:25. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-25.
9
Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.剖宫产术中皮肤缝合的技术与材料
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD003577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003577.pub3.
10
Comparing skin staples to sutures.比较皮肤钉与缝线。
Can Fam Physician. 1989 Mar;35:505-9.