Suppr超能文献

两种纤维支气管镜导管的比较评估:堵塞式伸缩导管与单鞘非堵塞导管。

A comparative evaluation of two fiberoptic bronchoscopy catheters: the plugged telescoping catheter versus the single sheathed nonplugged catheter.

作者信息

Joshi J H, Wang K P, de Jongh C A, Newman K A, Wiernik P H, Schimpff S C

出版信息

Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Nov;126(5):860-3. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.5.860.

Abstract

We prospectively evaluated the ability of the plugged telescoping catheter (PTC) brush and the single sheathed nonplugged catheter brush to provide sterile lower respiratory tract samples during fiberoptic bronchoscopy in 19 noninfected patients with cancer. Both brushes were evaluated, in random order, in each of the 19 patients. The PTC brush and the single sheath brush were sterile in 12 and 5 patients, respectively, and in 7 patients, the PTC brush alone was sterile (p = 0.016, two-sided). Patients were anesthetized by lidocaine administered through the bronchoscope (6 patients), via an aerosol (3 patients), or by transtracheal injection (10 patients). The advantage of the PTC brush was evident only when aerosol or transtracheal anesthesia were used; the PTC brush was sterile in 9 of 13 patients, whereas the single sheathed brush was sterile in only 2 of these 13 (p = 0.016, two-sided). The plugged telescoping catheter brush is therefore more suitable than the single sheathed brush catheter for delivering sterile brushes to the lower respiratory tract during fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

摘要

我们前瞻性地评估了在19例未感染癌症患者的纤维支气管镜检查中,带塞可伸缩导管(PTC)刷和单鞘无塞导管刷获取无菌下呼吸道样本的能力。在这19例患者中,对两种刷子均按随机顺序进行了评估。PTC刷和单鞘刷分别在12例和5例患者中获得了无菌样本,在7例患者中,仅PTC刷获得了无菌样本(双侧p = 0.016)。患者通过支气管镜注入利多卡因(6例)、气雾剂(3例)或经气管注射(10例)进行麻醉。仅在使用气雾剂或经气管麻醉时,PTC刷的优势才明显;在这13例患者中,PTC刷在9例中获得了无菌样本,而单鞘刷仅在其中2例中获得了无菌样本(双侧p = 0.016)。因此,在纤维支气管镜检查期间,带塞可伸缩导管刷比单鞘刷导管更适合向下呼吸道输送无菌刷子。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验