Ollendick T H, Matson J L, Esveldt-Dawson K, Shapiro E S
J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Winter;13(4):645-54. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-645.
Two studies which examine the effectiveness of spelling remediation procedures are reported. In both studies, an alternating treatment design was employed. In the first study, positive practice overcorrection plus positive reinforcement was compared to positive practice alone and a no-remediation control condition. In the second study, positive practice plus positive reinforcement was compared to a traditional corrective procedure plus positive reinforcement and a traditional procedure when used alone. Results of both studies indicated that the combined positive practice plus positive reinforcement procedure was more efficient and that it was preferred by the children. Following brief training under this combined procedure, all children demonstrated 100% spelling accuracy.
报告了两项检验拼写矫正程序有效性的研究。在这两项研究中,均采用了交替治疗设计。在第一项研究中,将积极练习过度矫正加积极强化与单纯积极练习以及无矫正对照条件进行了比较。在第二项研究中,将积极练习加积极强化与传统矫正程序加积极强化以及单独使用传统程序进行了比较。两项研究的结果均表明,积极练习加积极强化的组合程序更有效,并且孩子们更喜欢该程序。在这种组合程序下经过简短训练后,所有孩子的拼写准确率均达到了100%。