Watkins G, Tarnopolsky A, Jenkins L M
Psychol Med. 1981 Feb;11(1):155-68. doi: 10.1017/s003329170005337x.
A domiciliary survey (sample size circa 6000) was conducted in areas of different aircraft noise exposure affected by London (Heathrow) Airport. Respondents were urban dwellers aged 16+. Their use of medicines, general practitioner services, hospital facilities and community services were investigated in relation both to the level of aircraft noise and to the degree of annoyance it causes. None of the indicators showed higher uptake in the high noise areas. The relationships between health indicators, noise and annoyance were not uniform. In areas exposed to high noise the use of non-prescribed drugs was significantly higher among 'very annoyed' than among 'less annoyed' respondents. The uptake of psychotropic drugs, and the use of general practice and out-patient services, tended to increase with increasing annoyance both in high- and low-noise areas, but the differences were not in all cases statistically significant. Parallels were drawn between these results and those of earlier analyses of the same survey related to the prevalence of acute and chronic symptoms. Suggestions for the analysis and interpretation of health effects of noise are put forward.
在受伦敦(希思罗)机场影响的不同飞机噪音暴露区域进行了一项入户调查(样本量约为6000)。受访者为16岁及以上的城市居民。针对飞机噪音水平及其造成的烦恼程度,对他们使用药物、全科医生服务、医院设施和社区服务的情况进行了调查。在高噪音区域,没有任何一项指标显示出更高的使用率。健康指标、噪音和烦恼之间的关系并不一致。在高噪音暴露区域,“非常烦恼”的受访者中使用非处方药的比例明显高于“不太烦恼”的受访者。在高噪音和低噪音区域,精神药物的使用以及全科医疗和门诊服务的利用情况都倾向于随着烦恼程度的增加而增加,但在所有情况下差异并不都具有统计学意义。这些结果与同一项调查早期关于急性和慢性症状患病率的分析结果进行了对比。并针对噪音对健康影响的分析和解读提出了建议。