• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗生素在手部软组织伤口初始处理中的应用。

Use of antibiotics in the initial management of soft tissue hand wounds.

作者信息

Haughey R E, Lammers R L, Wagner D K

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1981 Apr;10(4):187-92. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(81)80159-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(81)80159-x
PMID:7224261
Abstract

A prospective, randomized study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in the treatment of various types of soft tissue hand wounds. A total of 394 patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups, those receiving cephalexin (250 mg orally q.i.d. x 5 days), and the control group receiving no antibiotic. Patients were followed closely during the healing phase of their wounds. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of infection in the two groups.

摘要

开展了一项前瞻性随机研究,以确定预防性抗生素在治疗各种类型手部软组织伤口中的疗效。总共394例患者被随机分配到两个治疗组之一,一组接受头孢氨苄(口服250毫克,每日4次,共5天),对照组不使用抗生素。在伤口愈合阶段对患者进行密切随访。两组感染发生率无统计学差异。

相似文献

1
Use of antibiotics in the initial management of soft tissue hand wounds.抗生素在手部软组织伤口初始处理中的应用。
Ann Emerg Med. 1981 Apr;10(4):187-92. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(81)80159-x.
2
Prophylactic antibiotics for simple hand lacerations: time for a clinical trial?预防性使用抗生素治疗简单手部裂伤:临床试验的时机是否成熟?
Injury. 2012 Sep;43(9):1497-501. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 May 24.
3
A prospective trial of prophylactic antibiotics in hand lacerations.手部撕裂伤预防性抗生素的前瞻性试验。
Br J Surg. 1977 Jun;64(6):394-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800640605.
4
Antibiotic prophylaxis for ED patients with simple hand lacerations: a feasibility randomized controlled trial.单纯手部撕裂伤 ED 患者的抗生素预防:一项可行性随机对照试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;32(7):768-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.03.043. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
5
Prophylactic antibiotics in simple hand lacerations.单纯手部裂伤的预防性抗生素治疗。
JAMA. 1981 Mar 13;245(10):1055-6.
6
Low risk of infection in selected human bites treated without antibiotics.部分人类咬伤在不使用抗生素治疗的情况下感染风险较低。
Am J Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;22(1):10-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2003.09.004.
7
Management of low-velocity gunshot wounds of the hand.手部低速枪伤的处理
South Med J. 1978 Sep;71(9):1087-8. doi: 10.1097/00007611-197809000-00012.
8
Prophylactic oral antibiotics for low-risk dog bite wounds.低风险犬咬伤伤口的预防性口服抗生素
Pediatr Emerg Care. 1992 Aug;8(4):194-9. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199208000-00005.
9
Efficacy of perioperative cefamandole with postoperative cephalexin in the primary outpatient treatment of open wounds of the hand.围手术期使用头孢孟多并术后使用头孢氨苄对手部开放性伤口进行初级门诊治疗的疗效
J Hand Surg Am. 1988 Nov;13(6):960-4. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(88)90281-x.
10
The role of prophylactic antibodies following hand injuries.手部损伤后预防性抗体的作用。
Br J Clin Pract. 1980 Oct;34(10):290-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and Characterization of Facial Lacerations in Emergency Departments in the United States.美国急诊科面部撕裂伤的发病率及特征
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2024 Dec;17(4):NP113-NP120. doi: 10.1177/19433875241257572. Epub 2024 May 30.
2
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Plastic Surgery: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study.接受整形手术的儿科患者的外科抗菌预防:一项兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校适宜性方法共识研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Apr 11;11(4):506. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11040506.
3
Antibiotic Use in Hand Surgery: Surgeon Decision Making and Adherence to Available Evidence.
手部外科中的抗生素使用:外科医生的决策制定和对现有证据的遵循。
Hand (N Y). 2020 Jul;15(4):534-541. doi: 10.1177/1558944718812161. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
4
Prophylactic Antibiotic Therapy in Contaminated Traumatic Wounds: Two Days versus Five Days Treatment.污染性创伤伤口的预防性抗生素治疗:两天与五天治疗。
Bioimpacts. 2012;2(1):33-7. doi: 10.5681/bi.2012.004. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
5
Traumatic lacerations: what are the risks for infection and has the 'golden period' of laceration care disappeared?创伤性撕裂伤:感染的风险有哪些,“黄金时期”的撕裂伤护理是否已经消失?
Emerg Med J. 2014 Feb;31(2):96-100. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202143. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
6
Towards evidence based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Prophylactic antibiotics are not indicated in uncomplicated hand lacerations.迈向循证急诊医学:曼彻斯特皇家医院的最佳临床实践要点。单纯性手部裂伤无需预防性使用抗生素。
Emerg Med J. 2007 Mar;24(3):218. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.046821.