• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量损伤的严重程度。

Measuring the severity of injury.

作者信息

Stoner H B, Heath D F, Yates D W, Frayn K N

出版信息

J R Soc Med. 1980 Jan;73(1):19-22.

PMID:7230174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1440048/
Abstract

Attempts have been made to improve the Injury Severity Score (ISS) system of Baker et al. (1974) using plasma lactate data obtained from 277 patients shortly after injury and before treatment. The ISS is based on the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) values of the individual injuries, being the sum of the squares of the values for the three most severely injured regions. Log (plasma lactate concentration) is positively related to ISS over its whole range. It was not possible to vary the AIS values, either on clinical grounds or using a computer, in such a way that the variance of the log (plasma lactate concentration) about its regression line with ISS was significantly reduced. With a score based on the sum of the squares of the AIS values for all the patient's injuries, some improvement to the AIS values could be made but it was not statistically significant. At the present time Baker's ISS method would seem to be the best way of grading injuries for acute studies.

摘要

人们尝试利用277名患者受伤后不久且在治疗前获得的血浆乳酸数据来改进贝克等人(1974年)的损伤严重度评分(ISS)系统。ISS基于各个损伤的简明损伤定级(AIS)值,即三个最严重损伤区域的值的平方和。对数(血浆乳酸浓度)在其整个范围内与ISS呈正相关。无论是基于临床理由还是使用计算机,都无法以显著降低对数(血浆乳酸浓度)关于其与ISS回归线的方差的方式改变AIS值。对于基于患者所有损伤的AIS值平方和的评分,可以对AIS值进行一些改进,但在统计学上并不显著。目前,贝克的ISS方法似乎是急性研究中损伤分级的最佳方式。

相似文献

1
Measuring the severity of injury.测量损伤的严重程度。
J R Soc Med. 1980 Jan;73(1):19-22.
2
[Correlation between survival time and severity of injuries in fatal injuries in traffic accidents].[交通事故致命伤中生存时间与损伤严重程度的相关性]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2001 Nov-Dec;129(11-12):291-5.
3
ICISS: an international classification of disease-9 based injury severity score.ICISS:基于国际疾病分类第9版的损伤严重程度评分
J Trauma. 1996 Sep;41(3):380-6; discussion 386-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199609000-00002.
4
Specific abbreviated injury scale values are responsible for the underestimation of mortality in penetrating trauma patients by the injury severity score.特定的简明损伤定级(AIS)值导致损伤严重度评分低估穿透性创伤患者的死亡率。
J Trauma. 2011 Aug;71(2 Suppl 3):S384-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182287c8d.
5
Same Abbreviated Injury Scale Values May Be Associated with Different Risks to Mortality in Trauma Patients: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study Based on the Trauma Registry System in a Level I Trauma Center.相同的简明损伤定级量表分值可能与创伤患者的死亡率风险相关:一项基于一级创伤中心创伤登记系统的横断面回顾性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 11;14(12):1552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121552.
6
Impact of Adapting the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)-2005 from AIS-1998 on Injury Severity Scores and Clinical Outcome.适应 AIS-2005 对伤害严重程度评分和临床结果的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 10;16(24):5033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245033.
7
A note on the disjointed nature of the injury severity score.关于损伤严重程度评分不连贯性的一则说明。
J Trauma. 2004 Sep;57(3):479-85; discussion 486-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000141024.96440.7c.
8
The Injury Severity Score is unable to differentiate between poor care and severe injury.
J Trauma. 1996 Jun;40(6):944-50. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199606000-00013.
9
Abbreviated Injury Scale: not a reliable basis for summation of injury severity in trauma facilities?简略损伤量表:在创伤机构中作为损伤严重程度汇总的依据是否不可靠?
Injury. 2013 May;44(5):691-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.032. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
10
Injury severity scoring and length of stay in hospital of war casualties--demonstration of an association and possible selection bias.战争伤员的损伤严重程度评分与住院时间——关联性及可能的选择偏倚的论证
Int J Epidemiol. 1993 Oct;22(5):905-10. doi: 10.1093/ije/22.5.905.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Trauma Center Designation With Postdischarge Survival Among Older Adults With Injuries.创伤中心指定与老年创伤患者出院后生存的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222448. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2448.
2
Risk of Erectile Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort study in Taiwan.创伤性脑损伤后勃起功能障碍的风险:台湾一项基于全国人口的队列研究
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Jul;12(4):913-925. doi: 10.1177/1557988317750970. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
3
The injury severity score.损伤严重程度评分
World J Surg. 1983 Jan;7(1):12-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01655907.
4
The therapeutic implications of some recent research on trauma.近期一些关于创伤的研究的治疗意义。
Arch Emerg Med. 1984 Mar;1(1):5-16. doi: 10.1136/emj.1.1.5.
5
The effects of minor and moderately severe accidental chest injuries on pulmonary function in man.轻度和中度严重意外胸部损伤对人体肺功能的影响。
Arch Emerg Med. 1984 Mar;1(1):29-38. doi: 10.1136/emj.1.1.29.

本文引用的文献

1
EXCESS LACTATE: AN INDEX OF REVERSIBILITY OF SHOCK IN HUMAN PATIENTS.过量乳酸:人类患者休克可逆性的一个指标。
Science. 1964 Mar 27;143(3613):1457-9. doi: 10.1126/science.143.3613.1457.
2
The significance of lacticacidemia in the shock syndrome.乳酸血症在休克综合征中的意义。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1965 Jul 31;119(3):1133-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb47467.x.
3
Blood lactate in the prognosis of various forms of shock.血乳酸在各种类型休克预后中的作用
Ann Surg. 1971 Feb;173(2):308-13. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197102000-00021.
4
The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.损伤严重度评分:一种描述多发伤患者及评估急诊治疗的方法。
J Trauma. 1974 Mar;14(3):187-96.
5
Measures of severity of injury.损伤严重程度的测量方法。
Injury. 1978 Feb;9(3):184-7. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(78)90004-9.
6
Airway patency in fatal accidents.致命事故中的气道通畅情况。
Br Med J. 1977 Nov 12;2(6097):1249-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6097.1249.
7
Measuring the severity of injury.测量损伤的严重程度。
Br Med J. 1977 Nov 12;2(6097):1247-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6097.1247.
8
The relationships between plasma substrates and hormones and the severity of injury in 277 recently injured patients.277例近期受伤患者的血浆底物、激素与损伤严重程度之间的关系。
Clin Sci (Lond). 1979 Jan;56(6):563-73. doi: 10.1042/cs0560563.