Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222448. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2448.
Trauma centers improve outcomes for young patients with serious injuries. However, most injury-related hospital admissions and deaths occur in older adults, and it is not clear whether trauma center care provides the same benefit in this population.
To examine whether 30- and 365-day mortality of injured older adults is associated with the treating hospital's trauma center level.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective, population-based cohort study used Medicare claims data from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2016, for all fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries 66 years or older with inpatient admission for traumatic injury in 2014 to 2015. Data analysis was performed from January 1 to June 31, 2021. Preinjury health was measured using 2013 claims, and outcomes were measured through 2016. The population was stratified by anatomical injury pattern. Propensity scores for level I trauma center treatment were estimated using the Abbreviated Injury Scale, age, and residential proximity to trauma center and then used to match beneficiaries from each trauma level (I, II, III, and IV/non-trauma centers) by injury type.
Admitting hospital's trauma center level.
Case fatality rates (CFRs) at 30 and 365 days after injury, estimated in the matched sample using multivariable, hierarchical logistic regression models.
A total of 433 169 Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 82.9 [8.3] years; 68.4% female; 91.5% White) were included in the analysis. A total of 206 275 (47.6%) were admitted to non-trauma centers and 161 492 (37.3%) to level I or II trauma centers. Patients with isolated extremity fracture had the fewest deaths (365-day CFR ranged from 16.1% [95% CI, 11.2%-22.4%] to 17.4% [95% CI, 11.8%-24.6%] by trauma center status). Patients with both hip fracture and traumatic brain injury had the most deaths (365-day CFRs ranged from 33.4% [95% CI, 25.8%-42.1%] to 35.8% [95% CI, 28.9%-43.5%]).
These findings suggest that older adults do not benefit from existing trauma center care, which is designed with younger patients in mind. There is a critical need to improve trauma care practices to address common injury mechanisms and types of injury in older adults.
创伤中心改善了严重受伤的年轻患者的预后。然而,大多数与伤害相关的住院和死亡发生在老年人中,目前尚不清楚创伤中心治疗在这一人群中是否具有同样的益处。
研究受伤老年人 30 天和 365 天死亡率是否与治疗医院的创伤中心级别有关。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项前瞻性、基于人群的队列研究,使用了 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间所有接受费用报销的 Medicare 受益人的 Medicare 索赔数据,这些受益人为 2014 年至 2015 年期间因创伤性损伤而住院的 66 岁或以上的患者。数据分析于 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 6 月 31 日进行。使用 2013 年的索赔数据来衡量受伤前的健康状况,通过 2016 年的数据来衡量结果。根据解剖损伤模式对人群进行分层。使用简化损伤量表、年龄和靠近创伤中心的居住地来估计 I 级创伤中心治疗的倾向评分,然后根据损伤类型将每个创伤水平(I、II、III 和 IV/非创伤中心)的受益人与匹配。
入院医院的创伤中心级别。
使用多变量层次逻辑回归模型,在匹配样本中估计受伤后 30 天和 365 天的病死率(CFR)。
共纳入 433169 名 Medicare 受益人的数据(平均[标准差]年龄为 82.9[8.3]岁;68.4%为女性;91.5%为白人)。共有 206275 人(47.6%)入住非创伤中心,161492 人(37.3%)入住 I 级或 II 级创伤中心。单纯四肢骨折患者的死亡人数最少(365 天 CFR 范围为 16.1%[95%CI,11.2%-22.4%]至 17.4%[95%CI,11.8%-24.6%],按创伤中心状态划分)。同时患有髋部骨折和创伤性脑损伤的患者死亡人数最多(365 天 CFR 范围为 33.4%[95%CI,25.8%-42.1%]至 35.8%[95%CI,28.9%-43.5%])。
这些发现表明,老年人并没有从现有的创伤中心治疗中受益,而这种治疗是为年轻患者设计的。迫切需要改进创伤护理实践,以解决老年人中常见的损伤机制和损伤类型。