Gordon M, Oshman H
Percept Mot Skills. 1981 Jun;52(3):703-7. doi: 10.2466/pms.1981.52.3.703.
The Rorschach protocols of 20 boys (6 to 11 yr.) rated by their teachers as hyperactive and those of 20 nonhyperactive boys were compared along 16 indices, including R, P, M, FM, C, CF, FC, Sum C, A%, H%, F+%, Sum Shading, and the reaction times. The results suggested that children classified as hyperactive produce fewer movement (M) and Human (H) responses but a far greater percentage of Animal (A) responses than the matched clinic control group. Age-related effects occurred within the hyperactive group such that younger hyperactives produced a higher Sum C, a lower H% and F+%, and had shorter reaction times than the older hyperactives. Findings were discussed in terms of the assessment of hyperactivity within a conceptual framework which regards impulsivity as a major underlying dimension.
对20名被教师评定为多动的男孩(6至11岁)以及20名非多动男孩的罗夏墨迹测验记录,沿着16项指标进行了比较,这些指标包括R、P、M、FM、C、CF、FC、C总分、A%、H%、F+%、阴影总分以及反应时间。结果表明,与匹配的临床对照组相比,被归类为多动的儿童产生的运动(M)和人类(H)反应较少,但动物(A)反应的百分比要高得多。在多动组中出现了与年龄相关的效应,即年龄较小的多动儿童的C总分较高,H%和F+%较低,且反应时间比年龄较大的多动儿童短。研究结果在一个将冲动视为主要潜在维度的概念框架内,就多动的评估进行了讨论。