Cink R E, Thomas T R
Br J Sports Med. 1981 Sep;15(3):182-5. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.15.3.182.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of the predicted VO2 max from the Astrand-Ryhming nomogram, using the cycle ergometer as the sole exercise mode and following the recommended submaximal test protocol. In addition, two sets of age correction factors were compared for accuracy. Using the Astrand age correction factors, the SEE of the predicted VO2 max for the 40 male subjects was .42 L.min-1 or 5.7 ml.kg-1.min-1, (r = .76 and .83, respectively); there was no significant difference between the measured and the predicted means. Although virtually identical SEE and r were found when applying the von Dobeln age correction factors, a significantly lower predicted mean was found (p less than .05), which indicated a consistent tendency to underestimate the actual VO2 max. These results suggest that the Astrand age correction factors should be used in conjunction with the Astrand-Ryhming nomogram, especially when classifying subjects into various fitness classifications.
本研究的目的是,以自行车测力计作为唯一的运动模式,并遵循推荐的次最大测试方案,评估阿斯特兰德-吕明诺模图预测的最大摄氧量的有效性。此外,还比较了两组年龄校正因子的准确性。使用阿斯特兰德年龄校正因子时,40名男性受试者预测的最大摄氧量的估计标准误为0.42L·min⁻¹或5.7ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹(r分别为0.76和0.83);测量均值与预测均值之间无显著差异。尽管应用冯·多贝尔恩年龄校正因子时发现估计标准误和r几乎相同,但预测均值显著更低(p<0.05),这表明存在一致低估实际最大摄氧量的趋势。这些结果表明,阿斯特兰德年龄校正因子应与阿斯特兰德-吕明诺模图结合使用,尤其是在将受试者分类到不同的健康分类时。