Tremper K K, Shoemaker W C
Crit Care Med. 1981 Oct;9(10):706-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198110000-00007.
One hundred and six critically ill adult patients were monitored continuously with a transcutaneous oxygen sensor (PtcO2); they also were intermittently monitored with conventional invasive hemodynamic and oxygen transport variables. A total of 1073 data sets were taken on 41 patients in the ICU and 65 patients in the operating room. The patients were divided into three groups by cardiac index (CI): relatively normal flow, CI greater than 2.2 L/min x M2; moderate low flow shock, 2.2 greater than CI greater than 1.5 L/min x M2; and severe low flow shock, CI less than 1.5 L/min x M2 x PtcO2 and arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) were compared in two ways: first by linear regression and second by a more simple clinical guide by indexing each transcutaneous value by its respective arterial value (PtcO2 index = PtcO2/PaO2). For 934 data sets taken on 92 patients not in shock, there was a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.89 and a PtcO2 index 0.79 +/- 0.12 (SD). In 5 patients with moderate shock, the r was 0.78 and the PtcO2 index was 0.48 +/- 0.07. In 9 patients with severe shock, there was no correlation between PtcO2 and PaO2 and the PtcO2 index was 0.12 +/- 0.12. In all cases of severe shock, the PtcO2 value responded quickly to changes in blood flow with an approximate 1 min response time (95%). The patients not in shock responded to changes in inspired oxygen concentration (FIO2) with changes in PaO2 and PtcO2 values; the 95% response time was approximately 2 min. The authors conclude that the normal value for PtcO2 for adult surgical patients who are hemodynamically stable is 79 +/- 12% of the PaO2 and that PtcO2 values were reliable, continuous, noninvasive trend monitors of PaO2 in these patients. During circulatory problems when PtcO2 values were compared to PaO2 values (PtcO2 index), the changes reflected trends in the severity of low flow shock.
106例成年危重症患者使用经皮氧传感器(PtcO2)进行持续监测;同时,他们还接受常规有创血流动力学和氧输送变量的间歇性监测。在重症监护病房(ICU)的41例患者和手术室的65例患者中,共采集了1073组数据集。根据心脏指数(CI)将患者分为三组:相对正常血流组,CI大于2.2L/min×m²;中度低血流休克组,2.2大于CI大于1.5L/min×m²;重度低血流休克组,CI小于1.5L/min×m²。PtcO2和动脉血氧分压(PaO2)通过两种方式进行比较:首先采用线性回归分析,其次采用更简单的临床指导方法,即将每个经皮值除以其相应的动脉值(PtcO2指数=PtcO2/PaO2)。对于92例非休克患者的934组数据集而言,相关系数(r)为0.89,PtcO2指数为0.79±0.12(标准差)。在5例中度休克患者中,r为0.78,PtcO2指数为0.48±0.07。在9例重度休克患者中,PtcO2与PaO2之间无相关性,PtcO2指数为0.12±0.12。在所有重度休克病例中,PtcO2值对血流变化反应迅速,反应时间约为1分钟(95%)。非休克患者的PaO2和PtcO2值随吸入氧浓度(FIO2)的变化而变化;95%的反应时间约为2分钟。作者得出结论,血流动力学稳定的成年外科患者PtcO2的正常值为PaO2的79±12%,并且PtcO2值是这些患者PaO2的可靠、连续、无创的趋势监测指标。在循环问题期间,当将PtcO2值与PaO2值进行比较(PtcO2指数)时,这些变化反映了低血流休克严重程度的趋势。