Tveit K M, Endresen L, Rugstad H E, Fodstad O, Pihl A
Br J Cancer. 1981 Oct;44(4):539-44. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1981.223.
Two soft-agar methods for assaying chemosensitivity of human cancers in vitro were compared with respect to colony morphology, plating efficiency (PE) and chemosensitivity of human melanomas. In 9 xenografts and 9 patients' biopsy specimens Method A (essentially that of Courtenay & Mills, 1978) gave considerably higher PE that Method B (essentially that of Hamburger & Salmon, 1977) and, in contrast to Method B, the number of colonies was proportional to the number of cells plated. Evidence was obtained that the observed differences in PE could be attributed to the low O2 concentration and the presence of rat red blood cells in Method A. Colony morphology was similar in the 2 assays. When cells from 4 xenografted melanomas were treated in vitro with DTIC, CCNU, vinblastine and abrin, and the inhibition of colony formation was assayed concurrently in the 2 soft-agar methods, the tumour cells appeared to be more sensitive to 3 of the drugs in Method B than in A. The results demonstrate that chemosensitivity data obtained with the 2 assays cannot be directly compared.
就集落形态、接种效率(PE)和人黑色素瘤的化学敏感性而言,对两种用于体外检测人类癌症化学敏感性的软琼脂方法进行了比较。在9个异种移植瘤和9例患者的活检标本中,方法A(本质上是Courtenay和Mills于1978年提出的方法)的PE比方法B(本质上是Hamburger和Salmon于1977年提出的方法)高得多,并且与方法B不同,集落数量与接种的细胞数量成正比。有证据表明,观察到的PE差异可能归因于方法A中低氧浓度和大鼠红细胞的存在。两种检测方法中的集落形态相似。当用达卡巴嗪、洛莫司汀、长春碱和相思子毒素对4个异种移植黑色素瘤的细胞进行体外处理,并同时用两种软琼脂方法检测集落形成的抑制情况时,肿瘤细胞在方法B中似乎比在方法A中对3种药物更敏感。结果表明,用这两种检测方法获得的化学敏感性数据不能直接比较。