Greenwald P, Friedlander B R, Lawrence C E, Hearne T, Earle K
J Occup Med. 1981 Oct;23(10):690-4. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198110000-00012.
Preliminary data showing over-representation of the Eastman Kodak Company (Rochester) on death certificates of brain tumor patients, and higher risk for older workers when compared to the general population, led to a case-control epidemiologic study. Chemical exposure histories of 56 workers with brain tumors were compared with those of other Kodak employees. No differences were found in exposure to a variety of chemicals. In addition, employees with brain tumors were compared to other upstate New York brain tumor patients; there was no difference in histology. However, the Kodak employees had diagnoses more frequently confirmed by histologic examination and more thorough diagnostic studies. Thus, the apparent initial excess of diagnosed tumors may have resulted from a "diagnostic sensitivity bias" arising from more complete medical evaluation of Kodak employees.
初步数据显示,伊士曼柯达公司(罗切斯特)在脑肿瘤患者死亡证明上的比例过高,且与普通人群相比,老年工人的风险更高,这引发了一项病例对照流行病学研究。将56名患脑肿瘤工人的化学物质接触史与柯达公司其他员工的接触史进行了比较。在接触各种化学物质方面未发现差异。此外,将患脑肿瘤的员工与纽约州北部其他脑肿瘤患者进行了比较;组织学方面没有差异。然而,柯达公司员工的诊断更频繁地通过组织学检查和更全面的诊断研究得到证实。因此,最初明显过多的确诊肿瘤可能是由于对柯达公司员工进行了更全面的医学评估而产生的“诊断敏感性偏差”。