Salber E J, Beza A G
Med Care. 1980 Mar;18(3):319-26. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198003000-00006.
This article emphasizes the advantages and disadvantages of the National Center for Health Statistics Health Interview Surveys (HIS) when applied to the needs of ethnic minorities at the local level. While HIS gives information on health status of minorities and their use of services at the national level, this information is of limited help to providers in local communities. In any national survey, the numbers of minority persons sampled will be very small and heterogeneous populations sharing a common language (for example, Spanish) may be aggregated though their characteristics may differ widely. Certain groups may be missed or their numbers greatly underestimated if they do not live in settled households, which form the unit of HIS. Pertinent examples are migrant farm workers and young adult black urban males. Other possible problems arise in the use of proxy respondents, in the HIS definition of acute illness, and in the rather infrequent use of linkage studies. While there are a number of important ways by which HIS surveys may be made more effective, special national surveys of specific minority groups and in-depth local surveys are needed to fill gaps in meeting minority needs.
本文强调了国家卫生统计中心健康访谈调查(HIS)应用于地方层面少数民族需求时的优缺点。虽然HIS能提供全国层面少数民族健康状况及其服务利用情况的信息,但这些信息对当地社区的服务提供者帮助有限。在任何全国性调查中,抽样的少数民族人数会非常少,而且讲同一种语言(如西班牙语)的异质人群可能会被汇总,尽管他们的特征可能差异很大。如果某些群体不住在作为HIS调查单位的固定家庭中,可能会被遗漏或人数被大大低估。相关例子有流动农场工人和年轻的城市黑人男性。在使用代理受访者、HIS对急性疾病的定义以及相当不常使用的关联研究方面还会出现其他可能的问题。虽然有许多重要方法可使HIS调查更有效,但仍需要针对特定少数民族群体的专项全国性调查和深入的地方调查来填补满足少数民族需求方面的空白。