• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理建构与思维障碍:“困难”假设的另一项检验

Psychological construing and thought disorder: another test of the 'difficulty' hypothesis.

作者信息

McPherson F M, Armstrong J, Heather B B

出版信息

Br J Med Psychol. 1978 Dec;51(4):319-24. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1978.tb02477.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1978.tb02477.x
PMID:737144
Abstract

Two versions of the grid test of thought disorder were derived which used similar elements, and were of equal difficulty, but one of which employed psychological, and the other non-psychological, constructs. They were administered to thought-disordered schizophrenic patients and to psychiatric and normal controls. On one measure (consistency), although not on the other (intensity), the results strongly supported the hypothesis that thought-disordered patients are maximally disordered in the area of psychological construing. The results support those of an earlier study (McPherson et al. 1975) and are compatible with those theories which postulate a role for social factors in the aetiology of thought disorder.

摘要

思维紊乱网格测试的两个版本由此而来,它们使用了相似的元素,难度相当,但其中一个采用心理学构建,另一个采用非心理学构建。这两个版本的测试被施用于思维紊乱的精神分裂症患者以及精神科对照患者和正常对照者。在一项指标(一致性)上,而非另一项指标(强度)上,结果有力地支持了这样的假设,即思维紊乱的患者在心理学阐释领域的紊乱程度最大。这些结果支持了早期一项研究(麦克弗森等人,1975年)的结果,并且与那些假定社会因素在思维紊乱病因学中起作用的理论相符。

相似文献

1
Psychological construing and thought disorder: another test of the 'difficulty' hypothesis.心理建构与思维障碍:“困难”假设的另一项检验
Br J Med Psychol. 1978 Dec;51(4):319-24. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1978.tb02477.x.
2
The specificity of schizophrenic thought disorder.精神分裂症思维障碍的特异性。
Br J Med Psychol. 1979 Jun;52(2):105-17. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1979.tb02501.x.
3
A comparison between the Grid Test of Schizophrenic Thought Disorder and diagnostic psychological testing.精神分裂症思维障碍网格测验与诊断性心理测试的比较。
Scand J Psychol. 1977;18(2):153-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1977.tb00270.x.
4
Conditional probabilities and the grid test for schizophrenic thought disorder.条件概率与精神分裂症思维障碍的网格测试
Br J Clin Psychol. 1981 Feb;20(1):57-66. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1981.tb00496.x.
5
The analysis of interactions in experiments on the specificity of schizophrenic thought disorder: a reply to Phillips.精神分裂症思维障碍特异性实验中的相互作用分析:对菲利普斯的回应
Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1978 Nov;17(4):379-82. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1978.tb00296.x.
6
Psychological construing, 'difficulty' and thought disorder.心理建构、“困难”与思维紊乱
Br J Med Psychol. 1975 Dec;48(4):303-15. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1975.tb02337.x.
7
An investigation of the construct validity of the Bannister-Fransella Grid Test of Schizophrenic Thought Disorder.对班尼斯特-弗兰塞拉精神分裂症思维障碍网格测试的结构效度的一项调查。
Br J Clin Psychol. 1982 Sep;21(Pt 3):199-204. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1982.tb00552.x.
8
Research findings on the nature of constructs in schizophrenics.关于精神分裂症患者心理结构本质的研究发现。
Br J Clin Psychol. 1981 Jun;20(2):123-30. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1981.tb00505.x.
9
The specificity of schizophrenic thought disorder: a replication and extension of previous findings.精神分裂症思维障碍的特异性:既往研究结果的重复与扩展
Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1976 Jun;15(2):131-7. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1976.tb00018.x.
10
A test of the interference and normal associate bias theories of schizophrenic cognitive deficit.对精神分裂症认知缺陷的干扰和正常关联偏差理论的一项测试。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1981 Mar;169(3):185-90. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198103000-00006.