Heijl A, Drance S M, Douglas G R
Arch Ophthalmol. 1980 Sep;98(9):1560-3. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1980.01020040412002.
The ability of fully automatic computerized perimetry to detect early glaucomatous field damage was compared with that of careful static and kinetic manual perimetry in a clinical study on 104 patients, 51 of whom had early glaucomatous field defects, 20 of whom were glaucoma suspects with no field defects, and 33 of whom were normal. The automatic perimeter used was the COMPETER automatic perimeter employing actual threshold measurements. The interpretation of the automatic fields followed a set of predetermined criteria. Fifty-one eyes had defects in the manual charts, 48 (94%) of which were detected by automatic perimetry using the central test point pattern of the perimeter. Two (4%) fields thought to be normal after manual perimetry were correctly found to be abnormal by the automatic perimeter, which yielded four (8%) false-positives in the normal fields. By using a different set of criteria for the interpretation of the automatic fields, the sensitivity could be increased to 98% of these early defects, but at the cost of 22% false-positives.
在一项针对104例患者的临床研究中,对全自动电脑视野计检测早期青光眼视野损害的能力与细致的静态和动态手动视野计进行了比较。其中51例患者有早期青光眼视野缺损,20例为无视野缺损的青光眼疑似患者,33例为正常人。所使用的自动视野计是采用实际阈值测量的COMPETER自动视野计。自动视野的解读遵循一组预先确定的标准。手动视野图中有51只眼睛存在缺损,其中48只(94%)通过使用视野计的中央测试点模式的自动视野计检测出来。手动视野检查后被认为正常的两只(4%)眼睛,自动视野计正确地发现为异常,在正常视野中产生了四只(8%)假阳性。通过使用另一组自动视野解读标准,这些早期缺损的敏感度可提高到98%,但代价是假阳性率为22%。