• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与植入式心脏复律除颤器患者驾驶相关的因素。

Factors related to driving in persons with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

作者信息

Craney J M, Powers M T

机构信息

Boston College.

出版信息

Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 1995 Summer;10(3):12-7.

PMID:7479657
Abstract

A study of 97 persons (mean age = 66 yrs, 79% male) with an ICD for an average of 2.2 years was conducted to determine whether patients resume driving (N = 72) post-ICD insertion despite instructions not to do so. Those who had resumed were queried about their driving habits, the presence of symptoms associated with arrhythmias, the occurrence of shocks in the previous year, and the importance of driving to maintenance of lifestyle. Our assumption was that patients return to driving to maintain their pre-ICD lifestyle of functional independence, and to resume social roles such as provider for the family. Seventy-four percent of subjects reported driving an average of 60 mi/week despite being instructed not to drive by their physician or other health care provider. Of those who resumed driving, > 4% had received a shock while driving. Over 86% of subjects believe driving was an important part of maintaining one's lifestyle. Reasons for driving included necessity (62%), such as to work or a physician appointment, or social (58%), such as driving to the store or church. Symptoms such as dizziness, palpitations and lightheadedness were experienced by 80% of subjects, with 43% receiving a shock from their ICD within the previous year. There were significant correlations between driving and the importance of driving to maintaining one's lifestyle (p < .05), driving for necessity (p < .01), for social reasons (p < .01) and being the primary driver in the family (p < .05).

摘要

对97名平均植入植入式心脏除颤器(ICD)2.2年的患者(平均年龄66岁,79%为男性)进行了一项研究,以确定尽管被指示不要开车,但植入ICD后患者(n = 72)是否仍恢复驾驶。对那些恢复驾驶的患者询问了他们的驾驶习惯、与心律失常相关症状的出现情况、前一年电击的发生情况以及驾驶对维持生活方式的重要性。我们的假设是,患者恢复驾驶是为了维持植入ICD前功能独立的生活方式,并恢复诸如家庭供养者等社会角色。74%的受试者报告称,尽管医生或其他医疗服务提供者指示他们不要开车,但他们平均每周仍驾驶60英里。在恢复驾驶的患者中,超过4%在驾驶时曾接受过电击。超过86%的受试者认为驾驶是维持个人生活方式的重要组成部分。驾驶的原因包括必要性(62%),如上班或去看医生,或社交(58%),如开车去商店或教堂。80%的受试者经历过头晕、心悸和头晕目眩等症状,43%的受试者在前一年曾接受过ICD的电击。驾驶与驾驶对维持个人生活方式的重要性(p < 0.05)、因必要性驾驶(p < 0.01)、因社交原因驾驶(p < 0.01)以及作为家庭主要驾驶者(p < 0.05)之间存在显著相关性。

相似文献

1
Factors related to driving in persons with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.与植入式心脏复律除颤器患者驾驶相关的因素。
Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 1995 Summer;10(3):12-7.
2
Leisure-time activities of patients with ICDs: findings of a survey with respect to sports activity, high altitude stays, and driving patterns.植入式心律转复除颤器患者的休闲活动:关于体育活动、高原停留和驾驶模式的调查结果
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Jul;31(7):845-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01098.x.
3
Resumption of driving after life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia.危及生命的室性快速性心律失常后恢复驾驶
N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 9;345(6):391-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200108093450601.
4
Baseline factors predicting early resumption of driving after life-threatening arrhythmias in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Trial.抗心律失常药物与植入式除颤器(AVID)试验中预测危及生命的心律失常后早期恢复驾驶的基线因素。
Am Heart J. 2001 Jul;142(1):99-104. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.115787.
5
[Automobile driving and implantable defibrillators].[汽车驾驶与植入式心脏除颤器]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2005 Apr;98(4):288-93.
6
Driving and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks for ventricular arrhythmias: results from the TOVA study.驾驶与植入式心律转复除颤器对室性心律失常的电击治疗:TOVA研究结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Dec 4;50(23):2233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.059. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
7
Experiences of driving and driving restrictions in recipients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator--the patient perspective.植入式心脏复律除颤器受者的驾驶体验和驾驶限制——患者视角。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010 Nov-Dec;25(6):E1-E10. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181e0f881.
8
Is it safe to allow patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators to drive? Learnings from a single center experience.允许植入式心脏复律除颤器患者开车安全吗?来自单中心经验的启示。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008 Dec;9(12):1241-5. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283108818.
9
Outcomes, problems and quality of life with the implantable cardioverter defibrillator.植入式心脏复律除颤器的治疗效果、问题及生活质量
Aust J Adv Nurs. 1999 Jun-Aug;16(4):14-9.
10
The implantable defibrillator and return to operation of vehicles study.可植入式除颤器与重返车辆操作研究。
Europace. 2013 Feb;15(2):212-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus254. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Driving following defibrillator implantation: development and pilot results from a nationwide questionnaire.植入除颤器后的驾驶情况:一项全国性问卷调查的开展及初步结果
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0949-3.
2
Driving restrictions for Dutch patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator : Compliance and associated factors.荷兰植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的驾驶限制:依从性及相关因素。
Neth Heart J. 2018 Feb;26(2):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s12471-017-1067-z.
3
Driving restrictions in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators and pacemakers.
植入式心脏复律除颤器和起搏器患者的驾驶限制
J Arrhythm. 2017 Dec;33(6):594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 28.