Hauser M D, Kralik J, Botto-Mahan C, Garrett M, Oser J
Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Nov 7;92(23):10811-14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.23.10811.
Self-recognition has been explored in nonlinguistic organisms by recording whether individuals touch a dye-marked area on visually inaccessible parts of their face while looking in a mirror or inspect parts of their body while using the mirror's reflection. Only chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans, and humans over the age of approximately 2 years consistently evidence self-directed mirror-guided behavior without experimenter training. To evaluate the inferred phylogenetic gap between hominoids and other animals, a modified dye-mark test was conducted with cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus), a New World monkey species. The white hair on the tamarins' head was color-dyed, thereby significantly altering a visually distinctive species-typical feature. Only individuals with dyed hair and prior mirror exposure touched their head while looking in the mirror. They looked longer in the mirror than controls, and some individuals used the mirror to observe visually inaccessible body parts. Prior failures to pass the mirror test may have been due to methodological problems, rather than to phylogenetic differences in the capacity for self-recognition. Specifically, an individual's sensitivity to experimentally modified parts of its body may depend crucially on the relative saliency of the modified part (e.g., face versus hair). Moreover, and in contrast to previous claims, we suggest that the mirror test may not be sufficient for assessing the concept of self or mental state attribution in nonlinguistic organisms.
通过记录个体在照镜子时是否触摸自己脸部视觉上看不到的部位的染料标记区域,或者在利用镜子反射观察身体部位时是否检查身体的某些部分,人们已经在非语言生物中探索了自我识别能力。只有黑猩猩、大猩猩、猩猩以及大约两岁以上的人类在没有实验者训练的情况下,始终表现出自我导向的镜像引导行为。为了评估类人猿与其他动物之间推断出的系统发育差距,对一种新大陆猴——棉顶狨(Saguinus oedipus)进行了改良的染料标记测试。棉顶狨头部的白毛被染上了颜色,从而显著改变了一种视觉上独特的物种典型特征。只有那些毛发被染色且之前接触过镜子的个体在照镜子时会触摸自己的头部。它们在镜子前的注视时间比对照组更长,并且一些个体利用镜子观察视觉上看不到的身体部位。之前未能通过镜子测试可能是由于方法上的问题,而不是自我识别能力的系统发育差异。具体而言,个体对其身体实验性改变部位的敏感度可能关键取决于改变部位的相对显著性(例如,脸部与毛发)。此外,与之前的观点相反,我们认为镜子测试可能不足以评估非语言生物的自我概念或心理状态归因。