Kroeger A, Mancheno M, Alarcon J, Pesse K
Latin American Centre for Health Studies, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995 Oct;53(4):313-23. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.313.
Between 1991 and 1994, an intervention program with permethrin- and lambdacyhalothrin-impregnated bed nets was carried out over a period of nine months in each of five endemic, malarious areas of Ecuador, Peru, and Colombia. This program was evaluated through household surveys, blood sampling, in-depth longitudinal studies, and entomologic analysis. Eighty-four communities (including approximately 35,000 individuals) were paired according to malaria incidence, size, and coverage with bed nets and then randomly allocated to intervention and control groups. The results showed that peoples' acceptance of the measure was related to their perception of an immediate protective effect against insects. The effectiveness of the bed nets, measured as a reduction of malaria incidence in intervention communities as against control communities, showed large variations between and within the study areas. The protective efficacy varied between 0% and 70% when looking only at the postintervention differences between intervention and control groups. The average protection was 40.8% when considering a four-month incidence of clinical malaria attacks and 28.3% when considering a two-week malaria incidence. Important factors for the success of the bed net program were insect susceptibility to pyrethroids, high coverage with impregnated bed nets, high malaria incidence, good community participation, high mosquito densities when people go to bed, and a high proportion of Plasmodium falciparum. In one area, where DDT spraying in the control communities was executed, the effectiveness of bed net impregnation was slightly better than that of spraying.
1991年至1994年期间,在厄瓜多尔、秘鲁和哥伦比亚的五个疟疾流行地区,分别开展了为期九个月的使用氯菊酯和高效氯氟氰菊酯浸渍蚊帐的干预项目。该项目通过家庭调查、血液采样、深入的纵向研究和昆虫学分析进行评估。根据疟疾发病率、规模和蚊帐覆盖率,将84个社区(约35000人)进行配对,然后随机分为干预组和对照组。结果表明,人们对该措施的接受程度与他们对预防昆虫直接保护作用的认知有关。以干预社区与对照社区疟疾发病率的降低来衡量,蚊帐的有效性在研究区域之间和区域内部都存在很大差异。仅看干预组和对照组干预后的差异,保护效果在0%至70%之间变化。考虑临床疟疾发作的四个月发病率时,平均保护率为40.8%;考虑两周疟疾发病率时,平均保护率为28.3%。蚊帐项目成功的重要因素包括昆虫对拟除虫菊酯的易感性、浸渍蚊帐的高覆盖率、高疟疾发病率、良好的社区参与度、人们睡觉时的高蚊虫密度以及恶性疟原虫的高比例。在一个对对照社区进行滴滴涕喷洒的地区,浸渍蚊帐的效果略优于喷洒。