Martinez-Suarez J V, Rodriguez-Tudela J L
Unidad de Micología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Jul;39(7):1512-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.7.1512.
Two groups of recent clinical isolates of Candida albicans consisting of 101 isolates for which fluconazole MICs were < or = 0.5 microgram/ml (n = 50) and > or = 4.0 micrograms/ml (n = 51), respectively, were compared for their susceptibilities to fluconazole, clotrimazole, miconazole, ketoconazole, and itraconazole. Susceptibility tests were performed by a photometer-read broth microdilution method with an improved RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 18 g of glucose per liter (RPMI-2% glucose; J. L. Rodríguez-Tudela and J. V. Martínez-Suárez, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:45-48, 1994). Preparation of drugs, basal medium, and inocula was done by the recommendations of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. The MIC endpoint was calculated objectively from the turbidimetric data read at 24 h as the lowest drug concentration at which growth was just equal to or less than 20% of that in the positive control well (MIC 80%). In vitro susceptibility testing separated azole-susceptible strains from the strains with decreased susceptibilities to azoles if wide ranges of concentrations (20 doubling dilutions) were used for ketoconazole, miconazole, and clotrimazole. By comparison with isolates for which fluconazole MICs were < or = 0.5 microgram/ml, those isolates for which fluconazole MICs were > or = 4.0 micrograms/ml were in general less susceptible to other azole drugs, but different patterns of decreased susceptibility were found, including uniform increases in the MICs of all azole derivatives, higher MICs of several azoles but not others, and elevated MICs of fluconazole only. On the other hand, decreased susceptibility to any other azole drug was never found among strains for which MICs of fluconazole were lower.
对两组白色念珠菌近期临床分离株进行了比较,这两组分离株分别为101株,其中氟康唑MICs≤0.5微克/毫升(n = 50)和≥4.0微克/毫升(n = 51),比较了它们对氟康唑、克霉唑、咪康唑、酮康唑和伊曲康唑的敏感性。药敏试验采用光度计读取的肉汤微量稀释法,使用改良的RPMI 1640培养基,每升添加18克葡萄糖(RPMI-2%葡萄糖;J. L. Rodríguez-Tudela和J. V. Martínez-Suárez,《抗菌药物化疗》38:45-48,1994)。药物、基础培养基和接种物的制备按照美国国家临床实验室标准委员会的建议进行。MIC终点根据24小时读取的比浊数据客观计算,即生长刚好等于或小于阳性对照孔中生长的20%时的最低药物浓度(MIC 80%)。如果对酮康唑、咪康唑和克霉唑使用宽浓度范围(20倍稀释)进行体外药敏试验,则可将唑类敏感菌株与对唑类敏感性降低的菌株区分开来。与氟康唑MICs≤0.5微克/毫升的分离株相比,氟康唑MICs≥4.0微克/毫升的那些分离株通常对其他唑类药物的敏感性较低,但发现了不同的敏感性降低模式,包括所有唑类衍生物的MIC均均匀增加、几种唑类的MIC较高但其他唑类没有、仅氟康唑的MIC升高。另一方面,在氟康唑MIC较低的菌株中从未发现对任何其他唑类药物的敏感性降低。