Simpson I N, Gisby J, Hemingway C P, Durodie J, Macpherson I
SmithKline Beecham, Betchworth, Surrey, United Kingdom.
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2254-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2254-2259.1995.
Mupirocin E-test strips have been evaluated for their ease of use and accuracy in determining the susceptibilities of 171 strains of Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. The susceptibility of each strain was determined on two occasions, using parallel E-test and agar dilution methodologies each time. To ensure similar precisions for statistical analyses, E-test MICs were rounded up to a standard twofold agar dilution scale. Clear, elliptical zones were obtained against Staphylococcus spp. M. catarrhalis also gave clear zones, but the scale intercept was often difficult to interpret because of the irregular shape of the inhibition zone. Poor growth sometimes resulted in less-distinct zones of inhibition against Streptococcus spp. and H. influenzae. Excellent correlation was observed between the the E-test and agar dilution against Staphylococcus spp. and H. influenzae, with > 95% of the E-test values falling within one log2 dilution of the corresponding agar MIC. The correlation was lower for Streptococcus spp. and M. catarrhalis, with 86 and 83%, respectively, of E-test results falling within one log2 dilution of the agar MIC. When E-test MICs did not agree exactly with the corresponding agar MIC against Staphylococcus spp. or Streptococcus spp., there was a tendency for the E-test to give a lower MIC. This bias has little effect upon individual MICs in staphylococci or in the generation of susceptibility interpretation errors ( < 1.5% overall), but it could reduce population geometric mean MICs by factors of 0.78 to 0.83. This effect was more marked for Streptococcus spp., reducing the population mean by a factor of 0.73 and resulting in 0.7% major and 8% very major errors. In contrast, the E-test tended to give higher MICs against M. catarrhalis, resulting in 7.3% major errors and increasing the population geometric mean MIC by a factor of 1.60.
已对莫匹罗星E试验条在确定171株葡萄球菌属、链球菌属、流感嗜血杆菌和卡他莫拉菌的药敏性方面的易用性和准确性进行了评估。每次使用平行的E试验和琼脂稀释方法,对每个菌株的药敏性进行两次测定。为确保统计分析具有相似的精度,将E试验的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)向上舍入到标准的两倍琼脂稀释刻度。针对葡萄球菌属获得了清晰的椭圆形抑菌圈。卡他莫拉菌也产生了清晰的抑菌圈,但由于抑菌圈形状不规则,刻度截距往往难以解读。生长不良有时导致针对链球菌属和流感嗜血杆菌的抑菌圈不太明显。在针对葡萄球菌属和流感嗜血杆菌的E试验与琼脂稀释法之间观察到极好的相关性,超过95%的E试验值落在相应琼脂MIC的一个log2稀释范围内。链球菌属和卡他莫拉菌的相关性较低,分别有86%和83%的E试验结果落在琼脂MIC的一个log2稀释范围内。当E试验的MIC与针对葡萄球菌属或链球菌属的相应琼脂MIC不完全一致时,E试验往往给出较低的MIC。这种偏差对葡萄球菌的个体MIC或药敏性判读错误的产生影响很小(总体<1.5%),但它可能使群体几何平均MIC降低0.78至0.83倍。这种影响在链球菌属中更为明显,使群体平均值降低0.73倍,并导致0.7%的主要错误和8%的极主要错误。相比之下,E试验针对卡他莫拉菌往往给出较高的MIC,导致7.3%的主要错误,并使群体几何平均MIC增加1.60倍。