Marion D W, Firlik A, McLaughlin M R
Brain Trauma Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA., USA.
New Horiz. 1995 Aug;3(3):439-47.
The management of brain swelling that frequently occurs following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) presents a difficult challenge for physicians treating these patients. A traditional cornerstone for the treatment of post-traumatic brain swelling has been prophylactic hyperventilation to reach PaCO2 levels of 25 to 28 torr. While there are anecdotal reports of improvement in intracranial pressure (ICP) and neurologic functioning following institution of this therapy, the only prospective, randomized trial of its use has found worse outcomes in those treated with prophylactic hyperventilation therapy for 5 days. That hyperventilation therapy might exacerbate secondary brain injury seems likely based on abnormalities in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and metabolism which result from TBI, and the potential for hyperventilation to worsen those abnormalities. Both global and regional CBF are critically reduced, and metabolism increased, during the first several hours and days after injury. As a result, focal ischemia is common following severe TBI. Hyperventilation causes a further decrease in CBF, often without a concomitant reduction in ICP. In some cases, TBI also causes an increase in cerebral vascular responsivity to hypocapnia, increasing the drop in regional CBF that occurs with hyperventilation. Thus, there is a well defined physiologic basis for expecting hyperventilation to cause worsened clinical outcomes following TBI. While this therapy clearly is indicated for the management of acute neurologic deterioration or intracranial hypertension refractory to all other forms of medical therapy, hyperventilation is no longer recommended as a first-line therapy for intracranial hypertension or as prophylactic therapy following severe TBI.
重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后经常出现的脑肿胀管理,给治疗这些患者的医生带来了艰巨挑战。创伤后脑肿胀治疗的传统基石一直是预防性过度通气,使动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)水平达到25至28托。虽然有轶事报道称实施这种治疗后颅内压(ICP)和神经功能有所改善,但关于其使用的唯一前瞻性随机试验发现,接受5天预防性过度通气治疗的患者预后更差。基于TBI导致的脑血流(CBF)和代谢异常,以及过度通气可能使这些异常恶化的情况,过度通气疗法可能会加重继发性脑损伤似乎是合理的。在损伤后的最初几个小时和几天内,全脑和局部CBF均严重降低,而代谢增加。因此,重度TBI后局灶性缺血很常见。过度通气会导致CBF进一步降低,而ICP通常不会随之降低。在某些情况下,TBI还会导致脑血管对低碳酸血症的反应性增加,加剧过度通气时局部CBF的下降。因此,有明确的生理基础预期过度通气会导致TBI后的临床预后恶化。虽然这种疗法显然适用于治疗急性神经功能恶化或对所有其他形式的药物治疗均无效的颅内高压,但过度通气不再被推荐作为颅内高压的一线治疗方法或重度TBI后的预防性治疗方法。