Nakajima M, Sano H, Burrow M F, Tagami J, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, Ciucchi B, Russell C M, Pashley D H
Department of Operative Dentistry, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan.
J Dent Res. 1995 Oct;74(10):1679-88. doi: 10.1177/00220345950740100901.
Tensile bond strength measurements are commonly used for the evaluation of dentin adhesive systems. Most tests are performed using extracted non-carious human or bovine dentin. However, the adhesion of resins to caries-affected dentin is still unclear. The objectives of this study were to test the hypothesis that bonding to caries-affected dentin is inferior to bonding to normal dentin, and that the quality of the hybrid layer plays a major role in creating good adhesion. We used a micro-tensile bond strength test to compare test bond strengths made to either caries-affected dentin or normal dentin, using three commercial adhesive systems (All Bond 2, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, and Clearfil Liner Bond II). For scanning electron microscopy, the polished interfaces between the adhesive bond and dentin were subjected to brief exposure to 10% phosphoric acid solution and 5% sodium hypochlorite, so that the quality of the hybrid layers could be observed. Bonding to normal dentin with either All Bond 2 (26.9 +/- 8.8 MPa) or Clearfil Liner Bond II (29.5 +/- 10.9 MPa) showed tensile bond strengths higher than those to caries-affected dentin (13.0 +/- 3.6 MPa and 14.0 +/- 4.3 MPa, respectively). The tensile bond strengths obtained with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose were similar in normal and caries-affected dentin (20.3 +/- 5.5 MPa and 18.5 +/- 4.0 MPa, respectively). The hybrid layers created by All Bond 2 in normal dentin and by Clearfil Liner Bond II in normal or caries-affected dentin showed phosphoric acid and sodium hypochlorite resistance, whereas the hybrid layers created by All Bond 2 in caries-affected dentin and those created by Scotchbond Multi-Purpose to normal and caries-affected dentin showed partial susceptibility to the acid and sodium hypochlorite treatment. The results indicate that the strength of adhesion to dentin depends upon both the adhesive system used and the type of dentin. Moreover, the quality of the hybrid layer may not always contribute significantly to tensile bond strength.
拉伸粘结强度测量通常用于评估牙本质粘结系统。大多数测试是使用拔除的无龋人类或牛牙本质进行的。然而,树脂与龋损牙本质的粘结情况仍不明确。本研究的目的是检验以下假设:与龋损牙本质的粘结不如与正常牙本质的粘结,并且混合层的质量在形成良好粘结中起主要作用。我们使用微拉伸粘结强度测试,采用三种市售粘结系统(全粘结2、多功能Scotchbond和Clearfil Liner Bond II)比较对龋损牙本质或正常牙本质的测试粘结强度。对于扫描电子显微镜检查,将粘结剂与牙本质之间的抛光界面短暂暴露于10%磷酸溶液和5%次氯酸钠中,以便观察混合层的质量。使用全粘结2(26.9±8.8兆帕)或Clearfil Liner Bond II(29.5±10.9兆帕)粘结正常牙本质时,其拉伸粘结强度高于粘结龋损牙本质时(分别为13.0±3.6兆帕和14.0±4.3兆帕)。多功能Scotchbond在正常牙本质和龋损牙本质中获得的拉伸粘结强度相似(分别为20.3±5.5兆帕和18.5±4.0兆帕)。全粘结2在正常牙本质中以及Clearfil Liner Bond II在正常或龋损牙本质中形成的混合层表现出耐磷酸和次氯酸钠性能,而全粘结2在龋损牙本质中形成的混合层以及多功能Scotchbond在正常和龋损牙本质中形成的混合层对酸和次氯酸钠处理表现出部分敏感性。结果表明,与牙本质的粘结强度取决于所使用的粘结系统和牙本质类型。此外,混合层的质量可能并不总是对拉伸粘结强度有显著贡献。