Boon T A, van Swol C F, van Venrooij G E, Beerlage H P, Verdaasdonk R M
Department of Urology, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands.
World J Urol. 1995;13(2):123-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00183628.
Laser prostatectomy for patients with complaints due to benign prostatic hyperplasia is a relatively new treatment option. The most effective procedure for coagulation and vaporization of the prostate is not yet known. In a prospective randomized study of 30 patients, 2 techniques for the delivery of laser energy were compared at 40 W for 90 s. The complications were minimal and antegrade ejaculation was preserved in 15 of 18 potent men. In 24 patients urodynamics evaluation was possible. In both groups a significant reduction in the symptom score was observed. The decrease in detrusor pressure at maximal flow and the increase in flow rate were, however, disappointing. No significant difference in the results was found between the two groups. The power setting needs to be changed in further studies.
对于因良性前列腺增生而出现症状的患者,激光前列腺切除术是一种相对较新的治疗选择。目前尚不清楚用于前列腺凝固和汽化的最有效手术方法。在一项针对30例患者的前瞻性随机研究中,比较了两种在40瓦功率下持续90秒的激光能量输送技术。并发症极少,18名性功能正常的男性中有15名保留了顺行射精功能。24例患者可行尿动力学评估。两组患者的症状评分均显著降低。然而,最大尿流率时逼尿肌压力的降低和尿流率的增加并不理想。两组结果之间未发现显著差异。在进一步的研究中需要改变功率设置。