DeLoache J S, Marzolf D P
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign 61820.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1995 Aug;60(1):155-73. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1995.1036.
A very common practice in the investigation of suspected sexual abuse is to use anatomically detailed dolls to interview children. The use of such dolls is particularly advocated for very young children. For a doll to be useful, however, children must accept and use it as a representation of themselves. Our previous research on 2- and 3-year-old children's understanding of symbolic objects led us to hypothesize that such very young children might have difficulty understanding and using a doll as a self-representation. In the study reported here, 2-1/2-, 3-, and 4-year-old children played some games with an experimenter, and they were interviewed immediately afterward. The children did, as expected, have difficulty using the doll as a self-representation and mapping from themselves to the doll. As a consequence, they provided more correct information in their direct (verbal and nonverbal) responses to the interviewer's questions than they demonstrated on the doll. Implications and limitations of this research are discussed with respect to interviewing young children.
在对疑似性虐待的调查中,一种非常常见的做法是使用解剖结构详细的玩偶来询问儿童。对于非常年幼的儿童,尤其提倡使用此类玩偶。然而,要使玩偶有用,儿童必须接受并将其用作自身的代表。我们之前对2岁和3岁儿童对象征性物体理解的研究使我们推测,如此年幼的儿童可能难以理解并将玩偶用作自我代表。在本文所报告的研究中,2.5岁、3岁和4岁的儿童与一名实验者玩了一些游戏,随后立即接受询问。正如预期的那样,儿童在将玩偶用作自我代表以及从自身映射到玩偶方面存在困难。因此,他们在对采访者问题的直接(言语和非言语)回答中提供的正确信息,比在玩偶上展示的更多。本文讨论了这项研究在询问幼儿方面的意义和局限性。