Suppr超能文献

医疗记录的保密性:患者视角

Confidentiality of medical records: the patient's perspective.

作者信息

Carman D, Britten N

机构信息

Department of General Practice, United Medical School of Guy's Hospital, London.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Sep;45(398):485-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The development of modern information technology and the increasing amount of multidisciplinary teamwork in primary health care mean that the principle of patient confidentiality is becoming difficult to uphold. The debate about confidentiality so far has paid little attention to patients' views.

AIM

A qualitative study was undertaken to explore patients' expectations and attitudes concerning confidentiality of patients' medical records in general practice.

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 39 patients from one general practice.

RESULTS

Patients' expectations diverged considerably from actual practice. The majority of interviewees felt that administrative and secretarial staff should not have access to medical records. Some patients had reservations about a doctor not directly involved in their care having access to their records. They were unaware of the fact that practice staff had ready access to their medical records. Interviewees had particular concerns about recording of nonmedical information in their records, and the confidentiality of computerized records.

CONCLUSION

Assumptions of shared doctor-patient definitions of confidentiality, at least in this practice, would be misplaced. It is suggested that explicit negotiations about what is recorded in patients' records would go some way to addressing the discrepancies identified in this study.

摘要

背景

现代信息技术的发展以及基层医疗保健中多学科团队合作的增加意味着患者保密原则越来越难以维持。迄今为止,关于保密的辩论很少关注患者的观点。

目的

进行一项定性研究,以探讨患者对全科医疗中患者病历保密的期望和态度。

方法

对来自一家全科诊所的39名患者进行了半结构化访谈。

结果

患者的期望与实际做法有很大差异。大多数受访者认为行政和秘书人员不应有权限访问病历。一些患者对未直接参与其护理的医生有权限访问他们的病历有所保留。他们不知道诊所工作人员可以随时访问他们的病历。受访者特别担心在他们的病历中记录非医疗信息以及计算机化记录的保密性。

结论

至少在这种做法中,假设医患对保密有共同的定义是错误的。建议就患者病历中记录的内容进行明确的谈判,这将在一定程度上解决本研究中发现的差异。

相似文献

9
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验