Pattanayak S, Sharma V P, Kalra N L, Orlov V S, Sharma R S
NMEP, Delhi, India.
Indian J Malariol. 1994 Dec;31(4):141-99.
The paper gives a brief history of malaria control in India through the National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP), National Malaria Eradication Programme (NMEP), implementation of the Modified Plan of Operation (MPO), strengthening of malaria control by launching P. falciparum Containment Programme (PfCP) and the Urban Malaria Scheme (UMS). Making reference to various evaluations of the NMEP, the paper analyses the present malaria situation and brings out reasons demanding change in the strategy of malaria control in consonance with the global malaria control strategy of the World Health Organization (WHO). The epidemiological analysis has revealed that the present adverse malaria situation concentrates mostly under the following five epidemiological paradigms viz. (i) tribal malaria, (ii) rural malaria, (iii) urban malaria, (iv) industrial malaria, and (v) border malaria. Malaria control requires specific approaches and control strategies for each paradigm. We have suggested changes/augmentation in the organizational set-up beginning from NMEP Directorate to the most peripheral health units. The primary responsibility of malaria prevention and control including cost in developmental projects should be shared by the corporate sectors through intersectoral coordination. Residual problems during maintenance phase of the project would come under the general health services. International and bilateral cooperation increases resources availability. The available tools and their rational use for malaria control in different epidemiological paradigms has been discussed with emphasis on integrated control, selective use of chemical insecticides and adoption of cost-effective and sustainable malaria control methods. In this context, intersectoral collaboration, community participation, training, operational research and health education have been discussed as the vital components for effective malaria control.
本文简述了印度通过国家疟疾控制计划(NMCP)、国家疟疾根除计划(NMEP)、实施修订后的行动计划(MPO)、启动恶性疟遏制计划(PfCP)和城市疟疾计划(UMS)来控制疟疾的历史。通过参考对NMEP的各种评估,本文分析了当前的疟疾形势,并提出了与世界卫生组织(WHO)的全球疟疾控制战略相一致的、要求改变疟疾控制策略的原因。流行病学分析表明,当前不利的疟疾形势主要集中在以下五种流行病学模式下,即:(i)部落疟疾,(ii)农村疟疾,(iii)城市疟疾,(iv)工业疟疾,以及(v)边境疟疾。疟疾控制需要针对每种模式采取特定的方法和控制策略。我们建议从NMEP局到最基层的卫生单位对组织结构进行变革/扩充。包括发展项目成本在内的疟疾预防和控制的主要责任应由企业部门通过部门间协调共同承担。项目维护阶段的遗留问题将由一般卫生服务部门负责。国际和双边合作增加了资源的可获得性。本文讨论了在不同流行病学模式下可用于疟疾控制的现有工具及其合理使用,重点强调了综合控制、化学杀虫剂的选择性使用以及采用具有成本效益和可持续性的疟疾控制方法。在此背景下,部门间协作、社区参与、培训、运筹学研究和健康教育被视为有效控制疟疾的关键要素。