Suppr超能文献

医院饮用水系统中军团菌属监测培养方法的比较及此类方法标准化的建议。

Comparison of culture methods for monitoring Legionella species in hospital potable water systems and recommendations for standardization of such methods.

作者信息

Ta A C, Stout J E, Yu V L, Wagener M M

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15240, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Aug;33(8):2118-23. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.8.2118-2123.1995.

Abstract

A lack of standardization of environmental monitoring techniques for Legionella spp. complicates the interpretation of results and comparisons of results from different institutions. A comparative assessment of techniques recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Hygiene Institute (Graz, Austria), and our laboratory was performed. Variables investigated were sampling method (swabbing and collection of water samples [250 ml] before and after swabbing), method of concentration (none, filtration, and centrifugation), acid buffer treatment (no acid treatment, treatment for 3 min, and treatment for 15 min), and choice of medium (five formulations of buffered charcoal yeast extract agar with glycine, vancomycin, polymyxin B, anisomycin, or cycloheximide). Thirty-three sites in seven hospital buildings were studied. Recovery by swab correlated with recovery from water after swabbing (P < 0.05). However, the quantity of Legionella spp. recovered from swab specimens (mean, 3.0 x 10(4) CFU per swab) was greater than that recovered from water (mean, 4.7 x 10(3) CFU/250 ml). Filtration resulted in recovery rates (mean, 5.2 x 10(3) CFU/250 ml) higher than those by centrifugation (mean, 2.3 x 10(3) CFU/250 ml). Three minutes of acid buffer treatment to reduce overgrowth by commensal flora did not improve selectivity or sensitivity for Legionella spp. if glycine-containing selective media were used. Fifteen minutes of acid buffer treatment reduced recovery compared with that after a 3-min treatment. All glycine-containing media tested effectively inhibited background flora, but one selective medium containing dyes, glycine, vancomycin, and polymyxin B (DGVP) resulted in the greatest quantitative recovery of Legionella pneumophila. Use of buffered charcoal yeast extract agar and the acid buffer treatment gave the greatest recovery of non-pneumophila species. A standardized protocol with an emphasis on the culturing of swab samples is presented.

摘要

军团菌属环境监测技术缺乏标准化,使得结果的解读以及不同机构间结果的比较变得复杂。我们对美国疾病控制与预防中心、奥地利格拉茨卫生研究所及我们实验室推荐的技术进行了比较评估。所研究的变量包括采样方法(擦拭以及擦拭前后采集水样[250毫升])、浓缩方法(无、过滤和离心)、酸缓冲液处理(无酸处理、3分钟处理和15分钟处理)以及培养基的选择(含甘氨酸、万古霉素、多粘菌素B、茴香霉素或放线菌酮的五种缓冲活性炭酵母提取物琼脂配方)。对七栋医院建筑中的33个地点进行了研究。擦拭物的回收率与擦拭后水样的回收率相关(P<0.05)。然而,从擦拭物标本中回收的军团菌属数量(平均每擦拭物3.0×10⁴CFU)高于从水中回收的数量(平均4.7×10³CFU/250毫升)。过滤后的回收率(平均5.2×10³CFU/250毫升)高于离心法(平均2.3×10³CFU/250毫升)。如果使用含甘氨酸的选择性培养基,用酸缓冲液处理3分钟以减少共生菌群的过度生长,并不会提高对军团菌属的选择性或敏感性。与3分钟处理相比,15分钟的酸缓冲液处理降低了回收率。所有测试的含甘氨酸培养基均有效抑制了背景菌群,但一种含染料、甘氨酸、万古霉素和多粘菌素B的选择性培养基(DGVP)使嗜肺军团菌的定量回收率最高。使用缓冲活性炭酵母提取物琼脂和酸缓冲液处理,非嗜肺军团菌的回收率最高。本文提出了一个强调擦拭样本培养的标准化方案。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Evaluation of an Environmental Transport Medium for Recovery.评价一种用于回收的环境运输介质。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 13;18(16):8551. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168551.
9
Diagnostic testing for Legionnaires' disease.军团病的诊断检测
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017 Aug 29;16(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12941-017-0229-6.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验