Suppr超能文献

医院自来水中嗜肺军团菌分离培养方法的比较研究

Comparative study of procedures for isolation and cultivation of Legionella pneumophila from tap water in hospitals.

作者信息

Reinthaler F F, Sattler J, Schaffler-Dullnig K, Weinmayr B, Marth E

机构信息

Hygiene Institute, University of Graz, Austria.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1993 May;31(5):1213-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.5.1213-1216.1993.

Abstract

For the isolation and cultivation of Legionella pneumophila from tap water in hospitals, we compared different media and selection techniques. A second part of the study compared the L. pneumophila yields from different water samples at identical sites. A total of 210 water samples (500 ml each) were collected from two selected sites in each of 21 hospitals. Warm water samples were collected after flow times of 0, 5, 10, and 15 min; in addition, one cold water sample was collected. Filtration was used to concentrate all samples. Following filtration, 0.1 and 1 ml each of untreated samples, heat-treated samples (3 min, 59 degrees C), and acid-treated samples (pH 2.2, 15 min) were spread onto the selective media MWY (SR 118; Oxoid) and BMPA alpha (SR 111; Oxoid), and samples from 12 hospitals were also spread onto GVPC medium (SR 152; Oxoid). A total of 72 (34%) of the 210 samples from 12 hospitals were positive. With respect to the positive Legionella cultures, there was no significant difference between the selective media MWY, BMPA alpha, and GVPC. With the BMPA alpha supplement, more samples were positive following heat treatment (P < 0.05) or acid treatment (P < 0.05) than without any further treatment. For the maximum yield of Legionella colonies with minimum additional microbial flora, acid treatment was the most effective, and by all methods, the GVPC supplement was the most selective. For routine water tests in hospitals for differentiating between systemic and local contamination, acid treatment of the concentrated samples, the use of different selective media, and the correct selection of sampling sites are recommended.

摘要

为了从医院自来水中分离和培养嗜肺军团菌,我们比较了不同的培养基和选择技术。该研究的第二部分比较了相同地点不同水样中的嗜肺军团菌产量。从21家医院的两个选定地点共采集了210份水样(每份500毫升)。在水流时间为0、5、10和15分钟后采集温水样;此外,还采集了一份冷水样。采用过滤法对所有样品进行浓缩。过滤后,将0.1毫升和1毫升未处理样品、热处理样品(59℃,3分钟)和酸处理样品(pH 2.2,15分钟)分别涂布于选择性培养基MWY(SR 118;Oxoid)和BMPAα(SR 111;Oxoid)上,来自12家医院的样品还涂布于GVPC培养基(SR 152;Oxoid)上。来自12家医院的210份样品中共有72份(34%)呈阳性。对于嗜肺军团菌阳性培养物,选择性培养基MWY、BMPAα和GVPC之间无显著差异。使用BMPAα补充剂时,热处理(P<0.05)或酸处理(P<0.05)后呈阳性的样品比未进行任何进一步处理的样品更多。为了以最少的额外微生物菌群获得最大产量的军团菌菌落,酸处理是最有效的,并且在所有方法中,GVPC补充剂的选择性最高。对于医院常规水质检测以区分全身性和局部污染,建议对浓缩样品进行酸处理、使用不同的选择性培养基并正确选择采样地点。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
9
Legionella in hospitals: a review.医院中的军团菌:综述
J Hosp Infect. 1991 Jun;18 Suppl A:481-9. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(91)90060-l.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验