Suppr超能文献

验证长期发病率记录。

Validating long term morbidity recording.

作者信息

Van Weel C

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Social Medicine, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Aug;49 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):29-32. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.suppl_1.29.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the validity of diagnosis made in a general practice based morbidity recording from 1967-90.

DESIGN

Clinical features of patients with a diagnosis of migraine headache and diabetes mellitus were compared with international diagnostic criteria for these conditions. For migraine headache the International Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care (ICHPPC) definition was used, while diabetes mellitus was defined according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.

SETTING

The continuous morbidity registry of the Department of General Practice and Social Medicine, University of Nijmegen, has been recording data from four general practices (12,000 patients) continuously since 1967. The database is used for longitudinal clinical research.

PATIENTS

All patients with migraine headache and living in the practice area at the time of study and matched controls with tension headache received a questionnaire asking about ICHPPC criteria symptoms of migraine. The medical records of all patients with diabetes mellitus at the time of diagnosis were compared with WHO criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

In 85% of patients with migraine headache, the questionnaire confirmed the ICHPPC defined criteria. Twenty nine per cent of the matched controls reported migraine features. In 74% of the patients with diabetes mellitus the diagnosis was made in agreement with the WHO criteria: in 12% no clinical information from the time of diagnosis could be traced.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnoses of migraine headache and diabetes mellitus in the registry largely agreed with international criteria. The quality control of recorded data is satisfactory, and the registry might serve as a model for other primary care based databases.

摘要

研究目的

评估1967年至1990年基于全科医疗发病率记录所做出诊断的有效性。

设计

将诊断为偏头痛和糖尿病的患者的临床特征与这些疾病的国际诊断标准进行比较。对于偏头痛,采用初级保健中的国际健康问题分类(ICHPPC)定义,而糖尿病则根据世界卫生组织(WHO)标准进行定义。

背景

奈梅亨大学全科医疗与社会医学系的连续发病率登记处自1967年以来一直在持续记录来自四个全科医疗机构(12,000名患者)的数据。该数据库用于纵向临床研究。

患者

所有在研究期间居住在医疗机构所在区域的偏头痛患者以及匹配的紧张性头痛对照者都收到了一份关于ICHPPC偏头痛标准症状的问卷。将所有糖尿病患者诊断时的病历与WHO标准进行比较。

主要结果

在85%的偏头痛患者中,问卷确认符合ICHPPC定义的标准。29%的匹配对照者报告有偏头痛特征。在74%的糖尿病患者中,诊断符合WHO标准:12%的患者无法追溯到诊断时的临床信息。

结论

登记处中偏头痛和糖尿病的诊断在很大程度上与国际标准一致。记录数据的质量控制令人满意,该登记处可作为其他基于初级保健的数据库的典范。

相似文献

1
Validating long term morbidity recording.验证长期发病率记录。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Aug;49 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):29-32. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.suppl_1.29.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验