Suppr超能文献

源自频繁采样静脉葡萄糖耐量(FSIGT)测试的简单胰岛素敏感性测量方法的探索。胰岛素抵抗动脉粥样硬化研究。

Exploration of simple insulin sensitivity measures derived from frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance (FSIGT) tests. The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study.

作者信息

Anderson R L, Hamman R F, Savage P J, Saad M F, Laws A, Kades W W, Sands R E, Cefalu W

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Oct 1;142(7):724-32. doi: 10.1093/aje/142.7.724.

Abstract

Both abnormal insulin levels and low insulin sensitivity have been implicated as risk factors for Type II diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. While insulin level is relatively simple to assess, direct measurement of insulin sensitivity is much more invasive, costly, and time-consuming. The authors considered eight previously described measures or indices of indices of insulin sensitivity derived from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT). Each one was evaluated by strength and consistency of association with insulin sensitivity computed from glucose clamp (SI(clamp)), across three glucose tolerance groups, including participants with normal glucose tolerance (n = 11), impaired glucose tolerance (n = 20), and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (n = 24). Minimal model analysis (MINMOD SI(22)), based on the 22-sample FSIGT, performed best based on statistical criteria of strong and consistent association with SI(clamp). An insulin sensitivity measure similar to that of Galvin et al. (Diabetic Medicine 1990;9:921-8), defined as glucose disappearance (10-50 minutes) divided by insulin area under the curve above baseline from 0-50 minutes, performed best based on statistical criteria and time-savings. Galvin insulin sensitivity is simple to calculate, requires only a 50-minute FSIGT, and is significantly (p < 0.001) and not inconsistently (p = 0.12 for inconsistent association) associated with SI(clamp) over a wide range of glucose tolerance.

摘要

异常的胰岛素水平和低胰岛素敏感性均被认为是II型糖尿病和心血管疾病的危险因素。虽然胰岛素水平相对易于评估,但直接测量胰岛素敏感性则更具侵入性、成本更高且耗时更长。作者考虑了先前描述的八项从频繁采样静脉葡萄糖耐量试验(FSIGT)得出的胰岛素敏感性测量方法或指标。在三个葡萄糖耐量组中,包括糖耐量正常的参与者(n = 11)、糖耐量受损的参与者(n = 20)和非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者(n = 24),对每一项指标与通过葡萄糖钳夹法计算得出的胰岛素敏感性(SI(clamp))之间关联的强度和一致性进行了评估。基于22样本FSIGT的最小模型分析(MINMOD SI(22)),根据与SI(clamp)有强且一致关联的统计标准,表现最佳。一种与Galvin等人(《糖尿病医学》1990年;9:921 - 8)类似的胰岛素敏感性测量方法,定义为葡萄糖消失量(10 - 50分钟)除以0 - 50分钟高于基线的胰岛素曲线下面积,根据统计标准和节省时间方面表现最佳。Galvin胰岛素敏感性易于计算,仅需50分钟的FSIGT,并且在广泛的葡萄糖耐量范围内与SI(clamp)有显著关联(p < 0.001)且并非不一致关联(不一致关联的p值为0.12)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验