Böttiger B W, Rauch H, Böhrer H, Motsch J, Soder M, Fleischer F, Martin E
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1995 Aug;9(4):405-11. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(05)80095-3.
Continuous thermodilution cardiac output (CCO) measurement was clinically evaluated in patients who underwent coronary revascularization using hypothermic low-flow, low-pressure cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
Prospective study.
University hospital setting.
30 cardiac surgical patients.
CCO was correlated to standard bolus thermodilution cardiac output (ICO) obtained at end-expiration.
Measurements were taken at selected time points (n = 18) before anesthesia induction, before CPB, and 5 minutes to 12 hours after CPB. A total of 540 data pairs were thus obtained. ICO ranged from 1.9 to 9.9 L/min, CCO from 1.5 to 9.9 L/min. Correlation between ICO and CCO was highly significant (r = 0.872; p < 0.01), accompanied by an excellent accuracy (bias -0.0213 L) and precision (0.59 L) before CPB and more than 45 minutes after CPB. However, during the first 45 minutes after CPB, there was no correlation (r = 0.273) between ICO and CCO, and ICO tended to be relatively high, whereas CCO measurements showed relatively low values. During the first 45 minutes after hypothermic CPB, but not during the ensuing time period, central blood temperature decreased, which may be interpreted as a lack of thermal equilibration between central and peripheral compartments. It is hypothesized that thermal instability in combination with increased respiratory variations in pulmonary artery blood temperature caused inhomogenous rewarming of different body sites and might be the main reason for the lack of correlation between ICO and CCO.
Despite an excellent correlation, accuracy, and precision between CCO and ICO before CPB and more than 45 minutes after hypothermic CPB, a lack of correlation in the early phase after CPB has been found. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the underlying cause of these findings and to clarify whether ICO or CCO or both fail to represent the real cardiac output up to 45 minutes after weaning from hypothermic CPB.
对接受低温低流量、低压体外循环(CPB)冠状动脉血运重建术的患者进行连续热稀释心输出量(CCO)测量的临床评估。
前瞻性研究。
大学医院。
30名心脏外科患者。
将CCO与呼气末获得的标准团注热稀释心输出量(ICO)进行相关性分析。
在麻醉诱导前、CPB前以及CPB后5分钟至12小时的选定时间点(n = 18)进行测量。共获得540对数据。ICO范围为1.9至9.9升/分钟,CCO范围为1.5至9.9升/分钟。CPB前及CPB后45分钟以上,ICO与CCO之间的相关性非常显著(r = 0.872;p < 0.01),同时具有出色的准确性(偏差 -0.0213升)和精密度(0.59升)。然而,在CPB后的前45分钟内,ICO与CCO之间无相关性(r = 0.273),ICO往往相对较高,而CCO测量值相对较低。在低温CPB后的前45分钟内,但在随后的时间段内未出现这种情况,中心血温下降,这可能被解释为中心与外周腔室之间缺乏热平衡。据推测,热不稳定与肺动脉血温呼吸变化增加相结合,导致不同身体部位复温不均匀,可能是ICO与CCO之间缺乏相关性的主要原因。
尽管CPB前及低温CPB后45分钟以上CCO与ICO之间具有良好的相关性、准确性和精密度,但发现CPB后早期缺乏相关性。需要进一步研究以阐明这些发现的潜在原因,并明确在低温CPB撤机后45分钟内,ICO或CCO或两者是否都不能代表实际心输出量。