Devine P L, Duroux M A, Quin R J, McGuckin M A, Joy G J, Ward B G, Pollard C W
Dept. Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1995 Jun;34(3):245-51. doi: 10.1007/BF00689716.
This is the first comparison of the three mucin based tests CA15-3, CASA, and MSA, and the cytokeratin-related TPS assay in breast cancer. The mucin markers were superior to TPS in receiver-operator analysis, though no marker was of use in the diagnosis of malignancy due to low sensitivity. Using cutpoints that gave 95% specificity in benign disease (n = 83), corresponding sensitivities in pre-treatment breast cancer (n = 123: 13 in situ, 54 stage I, 45 stage II, 4 stage III, 7 stage IV) were 17% (CA15-3), 16% (CASA), 13% (MSA), and 8% (TPS), with a strong relationship between marker levels and disease stage. These assays did not always detect the same patients, and the use of CA15-3 combined with CASA gave the highest sensitivity (23%), though this was not significantly better than the use of CA15-3 alone. Despite detecting similar antigens, these assays can show markedly different responses in some patients, indicating that one mucin-based test cannot be substituted for another.
这是对三种基于黏蛋白的检测方法(CA15-3、CASA和MSA)以及细胞角蛋白相关的TPS检测方法在乳腺癌中的首次比较。在接受者操作分析中,黏蛋白标志物优于TPS,不过由于敏感性较低,没有一种标志物可用于恶性肿瘤的诊断。采用在良性疾病(n = 83)中特异性为95%的切点,治疗前乳腺癌(n = 123:13例原位癌、54例I期、45例II期、4例III期、7例IV期)的相应敏感性分别为17%(CA15-3)、16%(CASA)、13%(MSA)和8%(TPS),且标志物水平与疾病分期之间存在密切关系。这些检测方法并非总能检测出相同的患者,联合使用CA15-3和CASA的敏感性最高(23%),不过这并不显著优于单独使用CA15-3。尽管这些检测方法检测的是相似的抗原,但在某些患者中它们可能表现出明显不同的反应,这表明一种基于黏蛋白的检测方法不能替代另一种。