Suppr超能文献

血清粘蛋白抗原CASA和MSA在乳腺癌、卵巢癌、肺癌、胰腺癌、膀胱癌、结肠癌和前列腺癌中的研究。一项针对420名患者的盲法试验。

Serum mucin antigens CASA and MSA in tumors of the breast, ovary, lung, pancreas, bladder, colon, and prostate. A blind trial with 420 patients.

作者信息

Devine P L, McGuckin M A, Ramm L E, Ward B G, Pee D, Long S

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Cancer. 1993 Sep 15;72(6):2007-15. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930915)72:6<2007::aid-cncr2820720636>3.0.co;2-u.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The tumor markers CASA (cancer-associated serum antigen) and MSA (mammary serum antigen) have previously been shown to be useful in the clinical management of ovarian and breast carcinoma, respectively, but have not been assessed in other types of cancer. These assays were compared with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in a blind trial using sera from the Mayo Clinic-National Cancer Institute (NCI) Diagnostic Serum Bank.

METHODS

CASA and MSA were assessed retrospectively in a blind trial using 465 serum samples from the Mayo Clinic-NCI Diagnostic Serum Bank representing malignant and benign disease of the breast, ovary, lung, pancreas, bladder, colon, and prostate and age-matched and gender-matched healthy control donors. CASA, MSA, and PSA levels were determined using commercially available kits, and CEA values and clinical details were later provided by the Mayo Clinic.

RESULTS

CASA and MSA showed good reproducibility in 45 duplicate samples. CASA values were significantly elevated in the serum of patients with malignant tumors of the breast (44%), ovary (58%), lung (56%), prostate (48%), and bladder (54%), but not in those with benign conditions of these organs or pancreatic or colon cancer. MSA levels were only elevated significantly in cancers of the breast (52%) and ovary (58%). CASA showed significantly better sensitivity than either CEA (20%) or MSA (25%) in the detection of lung cancer, whereas CEA showed significantly superior detection of colon cancers (78%). CASA was not as sensitive as PSA in prostate cancer (48% versus 96%), but gave superior specificity in nonmalignant conditions of the prostate (93% versus 70%), although this was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The commercial CASA and MSA assays are reliable and reproducible tests for these tumor markers. In addition to ovarian cancer, CASA is also elevated significantly in many patients with breast, lung, prostate, and bladder cancer and has potential clinical use in patients with these tumors. The use of the MSA assay appears restricted to breast cancer.

摘要

背景

肿瘤标志物癌相关血清抗原(CASA)和乳腺血清抗原(MSA)此前已分别被证明在卵巢癌和乳腺癌的临床管理中有用,但尚未在其他类型癌症中进行评估。在一项盲法试验中,使用来自梅奥诊所 - 美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)诊断血清库的血清,将这些检测方法与癌胚抗原(CEA)和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)进行了比较。

方法

在一项盲法试验中,对来自梅奥诊所 - NCI诊断血清库的465份血清样本进行回顾性评估,这些样本代表了乳腺、卵巢、肺、胰腺、膀胱、结肠和前列腺的恶性和良性疾病以及年龄和性别匹配的健康对照供体。使用市售试剂盒测定CASA、MSA和PSA水平,CEA值和临床细节随后由梅奥诊所提供。

结果

CASA和MSA在45份重复样本中显示出良好的重复性。乳腺癌(44%)、卵巢癌(58%)、肺癌(56%)、前列腺癌(48%)和膀胱癌(54%)患者血清中的CASA值显著升高,但这些器官良性疾病患者或胰腺癌或结肠癌患者血清中的CASA值未升高。MSA水平仅在乳腺癌(52%)和卵巢癌(58%)中显著升高。在肺癌检测中,CASA的敏感性明显优于CEA(20%)或MSA(25%),而CEA在结肠癌检测中表现出明显更高的检出率(78%)。在前列腺癌中,CASA不如PSA敏感(48%对96%),但在前列腺非恶性疾病中具有更高的特异性(93%对70%),尽管这在统计学上无显著差异。

结论

市售的CASA和MSA检测方法是用于这些肿瘤标志物的可靠且可重复的检测方法。除卵巢癌外,许多乳腺癌、肺癌、前列腺癌和膀胱癌患者的CASA也显著升高,并且在这些肿瘤患者中具有潜在的临床应用价值。MSA检测的应用似乎仅限于乳腺癌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验