Priorities and rationing: pragmatism or principles?
作者信息
Klein R
出版信息
BMJ. 1995 Sep 23;311(7008):761-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7008.761.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Priorities and rationing: pragmatism or principles?优先事项与资源分配：实用主义还是原则？
BMJ. 1995 Sep 23;311(7008):761-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7008.761.
2
Setting priorities, can Britain learn from Sweden?确定优先事项，英国能向瑞典学习吗？
BMJ. 1996 Mar 16;312(7032):691-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7032.691.
3
Straight talk about rationing.关于定量配给的直言不讳的讨论。
Ann Intern Med. 1995 May 15;122(10):795-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-10-199505150-00011.
4
Priority setting in health care: learning from international experience.医疗保健中的优先事项设定：借鉴国际经验。
Health Policy. 1997 Oct;42(1):49-66. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(97)00054-7.
5
Choosing core health services in The Netherlands.在荷兰选择核心医疗服务。
Health Care Anal. 1993 Jun;1(1):43-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02196969.
6
Rationing by age: a short philosophical comment.按年龄分配资源：一则简短的哲学评论。
Health Care Anal. 1993 Nov;1(2):153-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02197109.
7
The right to health care in Sweden.瑞典的医疗保健权。
Eur J Health Law. 1996 Jun;3(2):163-71. doi: 10.1007/BF02731851.
8
The NHS's 50 anniversary. As others see us: views from abroad. Justice and health care in a caring society.英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）成立50周年。他人眼中的我们：来自国外的观点。关爱型社会中的正义与医疗保健。
BMJ. 1998 Jul 4;317(7150):53-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7150.53.
9
On the Oregon trail: rationing health care.在俄勒冈小道上：医疗保健配给
BMJ. 1991 Jan 5;302(6767):1-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6767.1.
10
Health care rationing.医疗保健资源分配
BMJ. 1995 Jun 10;310(6993):1483-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6993.1483.
引用本文的文献
1
Conceptualising characteristics of resources withdrawal from medical services: a systematic qualitative synthesis.医疗服务资源撤离的特征概念化：一项系统性定性综合研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Oct 28;18(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00630-9.
2
Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries.医疗保健中的优先事项设定：八个国家经验教训。
Int J Equity Health. 2008 Jan 21;7:4. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-7-4.
3
The impact of health economics on healthcare delivery. A primary care perspective.健康经济学对医疗服务提供的影响。初级保健视角。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Oct;18(4):311-5. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018040-00001.
4
Beta interferon, NICE, and rationing.β干扰素、英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所与医疗资源配给
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Sep;52(482):784-5.
5
Defining and cultivating the virtues.定义并培养美德。
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Sep;52(482):782-3.
6
An oral history of general practice 4: changing practice.全科医疗口述史4：不断变化的医疗实践
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Sep;52(482):780-1.
7
RCGP 'virtual genetics' group meeting: 'the use of the family history in primary care'.皇家全科医师学院“虚拟遗传学”小组会议：“家族病史在初级医疗中的应用”
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Sep;52(482):779.
8
The end of the affair--public health medicine 1974-2002.事件的终结——1974年至2002年的公共卫生医学
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Sep;52(482):778.
9
Are GP leaders scared of sex?全科医生领导者害怕性行为吗？
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Sep;52(482):777.
10
Alliteration in medicine: a puzzling profusion of p's.医学中的头韵：令人费解的大量字母“p”。
BMJ. 1999;319(7225):1605-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7225.1605.
本文引用的文献
1
Core services and priority-setting: the New Zealand experience.核心服务与优先事项设定：新西兰的经验
Health Policy. 1994 Jul-Aug;29(1-2):41-60. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(94)90006-x.
2
Ireland announces compensation for hepatitis c.爱尔兰宣布对丙型肝炎进行赔偿。
BMJ. 1995 Sep 23;311(7008):771. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7008.771a.
Zotero 插件