On the Oregon trail: rationing health care.
作者信息
Klein R
出版信息
BMJ. 1991 Jan 5;302(6767):1-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6767.1.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
On the Oregon trail: rationing health care.在俄勒冈小道上：医疗保健配给
BMJ. 1991 Jan 5;302(6767):1-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6767.1.
2
Rationing and resource management.配给与资源管理。
Br J Plast Surg. 1994 Apr;47(3):162-6. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(94)90047-7.
3
Muddling through elegantly: finding the proper balance in rationing.巧妙应对：在资源分配中找到恰当平衡。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 Sep-Oct;16(5):83-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.5.83.
4
Health care rationing.医疗保健资源分配
BMJ. 1995 Jun 10;310(6993):1483-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6993.1483.
5
Rationing care in Oregon: the new accountability.俄勒冈州的医疗资源配给：新的问责制。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1991 Summer;10(2):7-27. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.10.2.7.
6
Retracing the Oregon trail: the experience of rationing and the Oregon health plan.追溯俄勒冈之路：配给制的经历与俄勒冈健康计划
BMJ. 1998 Jun 27;316(7149):1965-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7149.1965.
7
Rationing care in the community: engaging citizens in health care decision making.社区医疗资源分配：让公民参与医疗保健决策
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1999 Dec;24(6):1363-89. doi: 10.1215/03616878-24-6-1363.
8
BNHS (British National Health Service) age rationing: a riposte to Bates.英国国家医疗服务体系（BNHS）的年龄配给：对贝茨的回应。
Health Care Anal. 1994 Feb;2(1):39-41. doi: 10.1007/BF02251335.
9
The Oregon health care proposal and the Americans with Disabilities Act.俄勒冈州医疗保健提案与《美国残疾人法案》。
Harv Law Rev. 1993 Apr;106(6):1296-313.
10
Prioritization of health care services. A progress report by the Oregon Health Services Commission.医疗保健服务的优先排序。俄勒冈州医疗服务委员会的进展报告。
Arch Intern Med. 1991 May;151(5):912-6.
引用本文的文献
1
Rationing health care: from needs to markets? The politics of destruction: rationing in the UK health care market.医疗保健配给：从需求到市场？破坏的政治：英国医疗保健市场中的配给
Health Care Anal. 1995 Nov;3(4):299-308; discussion 309-14. doi: 10.1007/BF02197076.
2
Retracing the Oregon trail: the experience of rationing and the Oregon health plan.追溯俄勒冈之路：配给制的经历与俄勒冈健康计划
BMJ. 1998 Jun 27;316(7149):1965-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7149.1965.
3
Paediatrics at the cutting edge: do we need clinical ethics committees?前沿儿科学：我们需要临床伦理委员会吗？
J Med Ethics. 1997 Aug;23(4):245-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.4.245.
4
Setting health priorities: community boards accurately reflect the preferences of the community's residents.确定卫生工作重点：社区委员会准确反映了社区居民的偏好。
J Community Health. 1997 Feb;22(1):57-68. doi: 10.1023/a:1025198924501.
5
Drug history taking and the identification of drug related problems in an accident and emergency department.在急诊科进行用药史采集及药物相关问题识别
J Accid Emerg Med. 1996 May;13(3):166-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.13.3.166.
6
Waiting list management in general practice: a review of orthopaedic patients.全科医疗中的候诊名单管理：骨科患者综述
BMJ. 1996 Apr 6;312(7035):887-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7035.887.
7
Setting priorities, can Britain learn from Sweden?确定优先事项，英国能向瑞典学习吗？
BMJ. 1996 Mar 16;312(7032):691-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7032.691.
8
Retinoblastoma in children of former residents of Seascale.西斯科尔前居民子女的视网膜母细胞瘤
BMJ. 1993 Mar 6;306(6878):650. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6878.650-a.
9
Screening for neuroblastoma.神经母细胞瘤筛查
BMJ. 1993 Jan 9;306(6870):143-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6870.143-b.
10
How can hospitals ration drugs? Drug rationing in a teaching hospital: a method to assign priorities. Drug Committee of the Royal Adelaide Hospital.医院如何进行药品配给？一家教学医院的药品配给：一种确定优先级的方法。阿德莱德皇家医院药品委员会。
BMJ. 1994 Apr 2;308(6933):901-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6933.901.
本文引用的文献
1
The outcomes movement--will it get us where we want to go?结果导向运动——它能引领我们抵达想去的地方吗？
N Engl J Med. 1990 Jul 26;323(4):266-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199007263230410.
2
Developing principles for prudent health care allocation. The continuing Oregon experiment.制定审慎的医疗保健资源分配原则。俄勒冈州的持续实验。
West J Med. 1990 Apr;152(4):441-6.
Zotero 插件