Health care rationing.
作者信息
Ham C
出版信息
BMJ. 1995 Jun 10;310(6993):1483-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6993.1483.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Health care rationing.医疗保健资源分配
BMJ. 1995 Jun 10;310(6993):1483-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6993.1483.
2
On the Oregon trail: rationing health care.在俄勒冈小道上：医疗保健配给
BMJ. 1991 Jan 5;302(6767):1-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6767.1.
3
Rationing and resource management.配给与资源管理。
Br J Plast Surg. 1994 Apr;47(3):162-6. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(94)90047-7.
4
Muddling through elegantly: finding the proper balance in rationing.巧妙应对：在资源分配中找到恰当平衡。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 Sep-Oct;16(5):83-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.5.83.
5
Priorities and rationing: pragmatism or principles?优先事项与资源分配：实用主义还是原则？
BMJ. 1995 Sep 23;311(7008):761-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7008.761.
6
BNHS (British National Health Service) age rationing: a riposte to Bates.英国国家医疗服务体系（BNHS）的年龄配给：对贝茨的回应。
Health Care Anal. 1994 Feb;2(1):39-41. doi: 10.1007/BF02251335.
7
Puzzling out priorities. Why we must acknowledge that rationing is a political process.理清优先事项。为何我们必须承认配给是一个政治过程。
BMJ. 1998 Oct 10;317(7164):959-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7164.959.
8
Rationing health care.医疗保健配给
BMJ. 1991 Feb 2;302(6771):288-9.
9
Rationing. What we can learn from Europe.
Med Econ. 1993 Sep 13;70(17):138-40, 143-4, 148-50.
10
The rationing debate. Defining a package of healthcare services the NHS is responsible for. The case for.配给制辩论。界定国民保健制度所负责的一揽子医疗服务。支持理由。
BMJ. 1997 Feb 15;314(7079):503-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.498.
引用本文的文献
1
Evaluation of the quality and cost-effectiveness of Versajet hydrosurgery.Versajet水刀手术的质量与成本效益评估。
Int Wound J. 2009 Feb;6(1):24-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00560.x.
2
Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries.医疗保健中的优先事项设定：八个国家经验教训。
Int J Equity Health. 2008 Jan 21;7:4. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-7-4.
3
Approaches to rationing drugs in hospitals. An Australian perspective.医院药品配给的方法。澳大利亚的视角。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Nov;10(5):467-74. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199610050-00004.
4
Choosing between competing health priorities. A government payer perspective.在相互竞争的卫生重点事项之间做出选择。政府支付方视角
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;9 Suppl 3:4-7; discussion 23-5. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199600093-00004.
5
Rationing: a transatlantic perspective.定量配给：跨大西洋视角
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Sep;46(410):543-5.
6
Health care rationing: the public's debate.医疗保健资源分配：公众的辩论。
BMJ. 1996 Mar 16;312(7032):670-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7032.670.
7
The Internet's challenge to health care provision.互联网对医疗保健服务的挑战。
BMJ. 1996 Jan 6;312(7022):3-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7022.3.
8
Rationing: the case for "muddling through elegantly".定量配给：“巧妙应付”的理由。
BMJ. 1995 Sep 23;311(7008):811. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7008.811.
Zotero 插件