Suppr超能文献

三种产前检查信息告知方法的随机试验

A randomised trial of three methods of giving information about prenatal testing.

作者信息

Thornton J G, Hewison J, Lilford R J, Vail A

机构信息

Institute of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Leeds University.

出版信息

BMJ. 1995 Oct 28;311(7013):1127-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1127.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the effect of extra non-directive information about prenatal testing, given individually or in a class.

SETTING

Antenatal clinics in a district general hospital and a university hospital.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial; participants allocated to control group or offer of extra information individually or in class.

SUBJECTS

1691 women booking antenatal care before 15 weeks' gestation.

INTERVENTIONS

All participants received the usual information about prenatal tests from hospital staff. Individual participants were offered a separate session with a research midwife in which prenatal screening was described in detail. Class participants were offered the same extra information in an early prenatal class.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Attendance at extra information sessions; uptake rates of prenatal tests; levels of anxiety, understanding, and satisfaction with decisions.

RESULTS

Attendance at classes was lower than at individual sessions (adjusted odds ratio 0.45; 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.58). Ultrasonography was almost universally accepted (99%) and was not affected by either intervention. Uptake of cystic fibrosis testing, high in controls (79%), was lowered in the individual group (0.44; 0.20 to 0.97) and classes (0.39; 0.18 to 0.86). Uptake of screening for Down's syndrome, already low (34%) in controls, was not further depressed by extra information in classes (0.99; 0.70 to 1.39) and was slightly higher in the individual group (1.45; 1.04 to 2.02). Women offered extra information had improved understanding and were more satisfied with information received; satisfaction with decisions about prenatal testing was unchanged. The offer of individual information reduced anxiety later in pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasonography is valued for non-medical reasons and chosen even by fully informed people who eschew prenatal diagnosis. The offer of extra information has no overall adverse effects on anxiety and reduces uptake of blood tests when background uptake rate is high (but not when it is already low). High uptake of prenatal blood tests suggests compliant behaviour and need for more information.

摘要

目的

测试单独或集中提供的关于产前检查的额外非指导性信息的效果。

设置

一家区综合医院和一家大学医院的产前诊所。

设计

随机对照试验;参与者被分配到对照组,或单独或集中获得额外信息。

研究对象

1691名在妊娠15周前预约产前护理的妇女。

干预措施

所有参与者均从医院工作人员处获得关于产前检查的常规信息。单独接受干预的参与者会与一名研究助产士单独会面,详细介绍产前筛查。集中接受干预的参与者在早期产前课程中获得相同的额外信息。

主要观察指标

参加额外信息课程的情况;产前检查的接受率;焦虑水平、理解程度以及对决策的满意度。

结果

集中课程的参与率低于单独会面(调整后的优势比为0.45;95%置信区间为0.35至0.58)。超声检查几乎被普遍接受(99%),且不受任何一种干预措施的影响。囊性纤维化检测的接受率在对照组较高(79%),在单独接受干预的组中降低(0.44;0.20至0.97),在集中接受干预的组中也降低(0.39;0.18至0.86)。唐氏综合征筛查的接受率在对照组本来就较低(34%),在集中接受额外信息的组中并未进一步降低(0.99;0.70至1.39),在单独接受干预的组中略高(1.45;1.04至2.02)。获得额外信息的女性理解能力有所提高,对所获信息更满意;对产前检查决策的满意度没有变化。提供单独信息可降低孕期后期的焦虑。

结论

超声检查因非医学原因受到重视,即使是那些了解情况并回避产前诊断的人也会选择。提供额外信息对焦虑没有总体不利影响,在背景接受率较高时会降低血液检查的接受率(但在接受率本来就低时不会)。产前血液检查的高接受率表明存在依从行为且需要更多信息。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Update and Review: Maternal Serum Screening.更新与综述:母血清筛查
J Genet Couns. 1997 Dec;6(4):395-417. doi: 10.1023/A:1025648926821.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening, ethics, and the law.筛查、伦理与法律。
BMJ. 1993 Jan 16;306(6871):209. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6871.209-a.
2
4
The hospital anxiety and depression scale.医院焦虑抑郁量表。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
5
Information control and the exercise of power in the obstetrical encounter.
Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(3):139-46. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(83)90247-2.
9
Randomised trial of self hypnosis for analgesia in labour.分娩时自我催眠镇痛的随机试验。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Mar 8;292(6521):657-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6521.657.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验